From: "tip-bot2 for Chengming Zhou" <tip-bot2@linutronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [tip: sched/core] sched/cpuacct: Optimize away RCU read lock
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2022 15:24:41 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <164614828189.16921.12676564993932566366.tip-bot2@tip-bot2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220220051426.5274-2-zhouchengming@bytedance.com>
The following commit has been merged into the sched/core branch of tip:
Commit-ID: dc6e0818bc9a0336d9accf3ea35d146d72aa7a18
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/dc6e0818bc9a0336d9accf3ea35d146d72aa7a18
Author: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com>
AuthorDate: Sun, 20 Feb 2022 13:14:25 +08:00
Committer: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
CommitterDate: Tue, 01 Mar 2022 16:18:38 +01:00
sched/cpuacct: Optimize away RCU read lock
Since cpuacct_charge() is called from the scheduler update_curr(),
we must already have rq lock held, then the RCU read lock can
be optimized away.
And do the same thing in it's wrapper cgroup_account_cputime(),
but we can't use lockdep_assert_rq_held() there, which defined
in kernel/sched/sched.h.
Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220220051426.5274-2-zhouchengming@bytedance.com
---
include/linux/cgroup.h | 2 --
kernel/sched/cpuacct.c | 4 +---
2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/cgroup.h b/include/linux/cgroup.h
index 75c1514..9a109c6 100644
--- a/include/linux/cgroup.h
+++ b/include/linux/cgroup.h
@@ -791,11 +791,9 @@ static inline void cgroup_account_cputime(struct task_struct *task,
cpuacct_charge(task, delta_exec);
- rcu_read_lock();
cgrp = task_dfl_cgroup(task);
if (cgroup_parent(cgrp))
__cgroup_account_cputime(cgrp, delta_exec);
- rcu_read_unlock();
}
static inline void cgroup_account_cputime_field(struct task_struct *task,
diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpuacct.c b/kernel/sched/cpuacct.c
index 3078005..f79f884 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/cpuacct.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/cpuacct.c
@@ -337,12 +337,10 @@ void cpuacct_charge(struct task_struct *tsk, u64 cputime)
unsigned int cpu = task_cpu(tsk);
struct cpuacct *ca;
- rcu_read_lock();
+ lockdep_assert_rq_held(cpu_rq(cpu));
for (ca = task_ca(tsk); ca; ca = parent_ca(ca))
*per_cpu_ptr(ca->cpuusage, cpu) += cputime;
-
- rcu_read_unlock();
}
/*
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-03-01 15:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-20 5:14 [PATCH v3 1/3] sched/cpuacct: fix charge percpu cpuusage Chengming Zhou
2022-02-20 5:14 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] sched/cpuacct: optimize away RCU read lock Chengming Zhou
2022-03-01 15:24 ` tip-bot2 for Chengming Zhou [this message]
[not found] ` <CGME20220308232034eucas1p2b0f39cee0f462af6004ebdfbe5bacb9f@eucas1p2.samsung.com>
2022-03-08 23:20 ` Marek Szyprowski
2022-03-08 23:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-03-08 23:44 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-03-09 0:21 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-03-10 8:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-03-10 15:01 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-03-12 12:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-03-12 17:44 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-03-09 3:08 ` [External] " Chengming Zhou
2022-02-20 5:14 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] sched/cpuacct: remove redundant " Chengming Zhou
2022-03-01 15:24 ` [tip: sched/core] sched/cpuacct: Remove " tip-bot2 for Chengming Zhou
[not found] ` <CGME20220308233107eucas1p119a2f5a8d4f5b5eec38ea8dde92b3368@eucas1p1.samsung.com>
2022-03-08 23:31 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] sched/cpuacct: remove " Marek Szyprowski
2022-02-22 18:01 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] sched/cpuacct: fix charge percpu cpuusage Tejun Heo
2022-02-23 9:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-03-01 15:24 ` [tip: sched/core] sched/cpuacct: Fix " tip-bot2 for Chengming Zhou
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=164614828189.16921.12676564993932566366.tip-bot2@tip-bot2 \
--to=tip-bot2@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=zhouchengming@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®