From: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Cc: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>, Lv Zheng <zetalog@gmail.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 4/6] ACPI / EC: Fix and clean up register access guarding logics.
Date: Fri, 15 May 2015 14:16:42 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <164c354d80ef91bc114cae2ae4dd48d27bcbd189.1431670199.git.lv.zheng@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1431670199.git.lv.zheng@intel.com>
In the polling mode, EC driver shouldn't access the EC registers too
frequently. Though this statement is concluded from the non-root caused
bugs (see links below), we've maintained the register access guarding
logics in the current EC driver. The guarding logics can be found here and
there, makes it hard to root cause real timing issues. This patch collects
the guarding logics into one single function so that all hidden logics
related to this can be seen clearly.
The current guarding related code also has several issues:
1. Per-transaction timestamp prevents inter-transaction guarding from being
implemented in the same place. We have an inter-transaction udelay() in
acpi_ec_transaction_unblocked(), this logic can be merged into ec_poll()
if we can use per-device timestamp. This patch completes such merge to
form a new ec_guard() function and collects all guarding related hidden
logics in it.
One hidden logic is: there is no inter-transaction guarding performed
for non MSI quirk (wait polling mode), this patch skips
inter-transaction guarding before wait_event_timeout() for the wait
polling mode to reveal the hidden logic.
The other hidden logic is: there is msleep() inter-transaction guarding
performed when the GPE storming is observed. As after merging this
commit:
Commit: e1d4d90fc0313d3d58cbd7912c90f8ef24df45ff
Subject: ACPI / EC: Refine command storm prevention support
EC_FLAGS_COMMAND_STORM is ensured to be cleared after invoking
acpi_ec_transaction_unlocked(), the msleep() guard logic will never
happen now. Since no one complains such change, this logic is likely
added during the old times where the EC race issues are not fixed and
the bugs are false root-caused to the timing issue. This patch simply
removes the out-dated logic. We can restore it by stop skipping
inter-transaction guarding for wait polling mode.
Two different delay values are defined for msleep() and udelay() while
they are merged in this patch to 550us.
2. time_after() causes additional delay in the polling mode (can only be
observed in noirq suspend/resume processes where polling mode is always
used) before advance_transaction() is invoked ("wait polling" log is
added before wait_event_timeout()). We can see 2 wait_event_timeout()
invocations. This is because time_after() ensures a ">" validation while
we only need a ">=" validation here:
[ 86.739909] ACPI: Waking up from system sleep state S3
[ 86.742857] ACPI : EC: 2: Increase command
[ 86.742859] ACPI : EC: ***** Command(RD_EC) started *****
[ 86.742861] ACPI : EC: ===== TASK (0) =====
[ 86.742871] ACPI : EC: EC_SC(R) = 0x20 SCI_EVT=1 BURST=0 CMD=0 IBF=0 OBF=0
[ 86.742873] ACPI : EC: EC_SC(W) = 0x80
[ 86.742876] ACPI : EC: ***** Event started *****
[ 86.742880] ACPI : EC: ~~~~~ wait polling ~~~~~
[ 86.743972] ACPI : EC: ~~~~~ wait polling ~~~~~
[ 86.747966] ACPI : EC: ===== TASK (0) =====
[ 86.747977] ACPI : EC: EC_SC(R) = 0x20 SCI_EVT=1 BURST=0 CMD=0 IBF=0 OBF=0
[ 86.747978] ACPI : EC: EC_DATA(W) = 0x06
[ 86.747981] ACPI : EC: ~~~~~ wait polling ~~~~~
[ 86.751971] ACPI : EC: ~~~~~ wait polling ~~~~~
[ 86.755969] ACPI : EC: ===== TASK (0) =====
[ 86.755991] ACPI : EC: EC_SC(R) = 0x21 SCI_EVT=1 BURST=0 CMD=0 IBF=0 OBF=1
[ 86.755993] ACPI : EC: EC_DATA(R) = 0x03
[ 86.755994] ACPI : EC: ~~~~~ wait polling ~~~~~
[ 86.755995] ACPI : EC: ***** Command(RD_EC) stopped *****
[ 86.755996] ACPI : EC: 1: Decrease command
This patch corrects this by using time_before() instead in ec_guard():
[ 54.283146] ACPI: Waking up from system sleep state S3
[ 54.285414] ACPI : EC: 2: Increase command
[ 54.285415] ACPI : EC: ***** Command(RD_EC) started *****
[ 54.285416] ACPI : EC: ~~~~~ wait polling ~~~~~
[ 54.285417] ACPI : EC: ===== TASK (0) =====
[ 54.285424] ACPI : EC: EC_SC(R) = 0x20 SCI_EVT=1 BURST=0 CMD=0 IBF=0 OBF=0
[ 54.285425] ACPI : EC: EC_SC(W) = 0x80
[ 54.285427] ACPI : EC: ***** Event started *****
[ 54.285429] ACPI : EC: ~~~~~ wait polling ~~~~~
[ 54.287209] ACPI : EC: ===== TASK (0) =====
[ 54.287218] ACPI : EC: EC_SC(R) = 0x20 SCI_EVT=1 BURST=0 CMD=0 IBF=0 OBF=0
[ 54.287219] ACPI : EC: EC_DATA(W) = 0x06
[ 54.287222] ACPI : EC: ~~~~~ wait polling ~~~~~
[ 54.291190] ACPI : EC: ===== TASK (0) =====
[ 54.291210] ACPI : EC: EC_SC(R) = 0x21 SCI_EVT=1 BURST=0 CMD=0 IBF=0 OBF=1
[ 54.291213] ACPI : EC: EC_DATA(R) = 0x03
[ 54.291214] ACPI : EC: ~~~~~ wait polling ~~~~~
[ 54.291215] ACPI : EC: ***** Command(RD_EC) stopped *****
[ 54.291216] ACPI : EC: 1: Decrease command
After cleaning up all guarding logics, we have one single function
ec_guard() collecting all old, non-root-caused, hidden logics. Then we can
easily tune the logics in one place to respond to the bug reports.
Except the time_before() change, all other changes do not change the
behavior of the EC driver.
Reference: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12011
Reference: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20242
Reference: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77431
Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>
---
drivers/acpi/ec.c | 82 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
drivers/acpi/internal.h | 1 +
2 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/ec.c b/drivers/acpi/ec.c
index 20bd43f..a521b6b 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/ec.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/ec.c
@@ -70,8 +70,7 @@ enum ec_command {
#define ACPI_EC_DELAY 500 /* Wait 500ms max. during EC ops */
#define ACPI_EC_UDELAY_GLK 1000 /* Wait 1ms max. to get global lock */
-#define ACPI_EC_MSI_UDELAY 550 /* Wait 550us for MSI EC */
-#define ACPI_EC_UDELAY_POLL 1000 /* Wait 1ms for EC transaction polling */
+#define ACPI_EC_UDELAY_POLL 550 /* Wait 1ms for EC transaction polling */
#define ACPI_EC_CLEAR_MAX 100 /* Maximum number of events to query
* when trying to clear the EC */
@@ -121,7 +120,6 @@ struct transaction {
u8 wlen;
u8 rlen;
u8 flags;
- unsigned long timestamp;
};
static int acpi_ec_query(struct acpi_ec *ec, u8 *data);
@@ -218,7 +216,7 @@ static inline u8 acpi_ec_read_data(struct acpi_ec *ec)
{
u8 x = inb(ec->data_addr);
- ec->curr->timestamp = jiffies;
+ ec->timestamp = jiffies;
ec_dbg_raw("EC_DATA(R) = 0x%2.2x", x);
return x;
}
@@ -227,14 +225,14 @@ static inline void acpi_ec_write_cmd(struct acpi_ec *ec, u8 command)
{
ec_dbg_raw("EC_SC(W) = 0x%2.2x", command);
outb(command, ec->command_addr);
- ec->curr->timestamp = jiffies;
+ ec->timestamp = jiffies;
}
static inline void acpi_ec_write_data(struct acpi_ec *ec, u8 data)
{
ec_dbg_raw("EC_DATA(W) = 0x%2.2x", data);
outb(data, ec->data_addr);
- ec->curr->timestamp = jiffies;
+ ec->timestamp = jiffies;
}
#ifdef DEBUG
@@ -392,6 +390,18 @@ static void acpi_ec_complete_query(struct acpi_ec *ec)
}
}
+static int ec_transaction_polled(struct acpi_ec *ec)
+{
+ unsigned long flags;
+ int ret = 0;
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&ec->lock, flags);
+ if (ec->curr && (ec->curr->flags & ACPI_EC_COMMAND_POLL))
+ ret = 1;
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ec->lock, flags);
+ return ret;
+}
+
static int ec_transaction_completed(struct acpi_ec *ec)
{
unsigned long flags;
@@ -490,8 +500,37 @@ static void start_transaction(struct acpi_ec *ec)
{
ec->curr->irq_count = ec->curr->wi = ec->curr->ri = 0;
ec->curr->flags = 0;
- ec->curr->timestamp = jiffies;
- advance_transaction(ec);
+}
+
+static int ec_guard(struct acpi_ec *ec)
+{
+ unsigned long guard = usecs_to_jiffies(ACPI_EC_UDELAY_POLL);
+ unsigned long timeout = ec->timestamp + guard;
+
+ do {
+ if (EC_FLAGS_MSI) {
+ /* Perform busy polling */
+ if (ec_transaction_completed(ec))
+ return 0;
+ udelay(jiffies_to_usecs(guard));
+ } else {
+ /*
+ * Perform wait polling
+ *
+ * The following check is there to keep the old
+ * logic - no inter-transaction guarding for the
+ * wait polling mode.
+ */
+ if (!ec_transaction_polled(ec))
+ break;
+ if (wait_event_timeout(ec->wait,
+ ec_transaction_completed(ec),
+ guard))
+ return 0;
+ }
+ /* Guard the register accesses for the polling modes */
+ } while (time_before(jiffies, timeout));
+ return -ETIME;
}
static int ec_poll(struct acpi_ec *ec)
@@ -502,24 +541,11 @@ static int ec_poll(struct acpi_ec *ec)
while (repeat--) {
unsigned long delay = jiffies +
msecs_to_jiffies(ec_delay);
- unsigned long usecs = ACPI_EC_UDELAY_POLL;
do {
- if (EC_FLAGS_MSI) {
- usecs = ACPI_EC_MSI_UDELAY;
- udelay(usecs);
- if (ec_transaction_completed(ec))
- return 0;
- } else {
- if (wait_event_timeout(ec->wait,
- ec_transaction_completed(ec),
- usecs_to_jiffies(usecs)))
- return 0;
- }
+ if (!ec_guard(ec))
+ return 0;
spin_lock_irqsave(&ec->lock, flags);
- if (time_after(jiffies,
- ec->curr->timestamp +
- usecs_to_jiffies(usecs)))
- advance_transaction(ec);
+ advance_transaction(ec);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ec->lock, flags);
} while (time_before(jiffies, delay));
pr_debug("controller reset, restart transaction\n");
@@ -536,8 +562,6 @@ static int acpi_ec_transaction_unlocked(struct acpi_ec *ec,
unsigned long tmp;
int ret = 0;
- if (EC_FLAGS_MSI)
- udelay(ACPI_EC_MSI_UDELAY);
/* start transaction */
spin_lock_irqsave(&ec->lock, tmp);
/* Enable GPE for command processing (IBF=0/OBF=1) */
@@ -551,7 +575,9 @@ static int acpi_ec_transaction_unlocked(struct acpi_ec *ec,
ec_dbg_req("Command(%s) started", acpi_ec_cmd_string(t->command));
start_transaction(ec);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ec->lock, tmp);
+
ret = ec_poll(ec);
+
spin_lock_irqsave(&ec->lock, tmp);
if (t->irq_count == ec_storm_threshold)
acpi_ec_clear_storm(ec, EC_FLAGS_COMMAND_STORM);
@@ -574,6 +600,7 @@ static int acpi_ec_transaction(struct acpi_ec *ec, struct transaction *t)
return -EINVAL;
if (t->rdata)
memset(t->rdata, 0, t->rlen);
+
mutex_lock(&ec->mutex);
if (ec->global_lock) {
status = acpi_acquire_global_lock(ACPI_EC_UDELAY_GLK, &glk);
@@ -585,8 +612,6 @@ static int acpi_ec_transaction(struct acpi_ec *ec, struct transaction *t)
status = acpi_ec_transaction_unlocked(ec, t);
- if (test_bit(EC_FLAGS_COMMAND_STORM, &ec->flags))
- msleep(1);
if (ec->global_lock)
acpi_release_global_lock(glk);
unlock:
@@ -1002,6 +1027,7 @@ static struct acpi_ec *make_acpi_ec(void)
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ec->list);
spin_lock_init(&ec->lock);
INIT_WORK(&ec->work, acpi_ec_gpe_poller);
+ ec->timestamp = jiffies;
return ec;
}
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/internal.h b/drivers/acpi/internal.h
index ba4a61e..61cb506 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/internal.h
+++ b/drivers/acpi/internal.h
@@ -138,6 +138,7 @@ struct acpi_ec {
struct transaction *curr;
spinlock_t lock;
struct work_struct work;
+ unsigned long timestamp;
};
extern struct acpi_ec *first_ec;
--
1.7.10
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-15 6:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <3b6064b23b148a9c3eed58566e9361a852618556.1430900840.git.lv.zheng@intel.com>
2015-05-15 6:16 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] ACPI / EC: Update due to recent changes Lv Zheng
2015-05-15 6:16 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] ACPI / EC: Update acpi_ec_is_gpe_raised() with new GPE status flag Lv Zheng
2015-05-15 6:16 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] ACPI / EC: Remove storming threashold enlarging quirk Lv Zheng
2015-05-15 6:16 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] ACPI / EC: Remove irqs_disabled() check Lv Zheng
2015-05-15 6:16 ` Lv Zheng [this message]
2015-05-15 6:16 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] ACPI / EC: Add module params for polling modes Lv Zheng
2015-05-15 6:16 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] ACPI / EC: Remove non-root-caused busy polling quirks Lv Zheng
2015-05-16 0:22 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] ACPI / EC: Update due to recent changes Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=164c354d80ef91bc114cae2ae4dd48d27bcbd189.1431670199.git.lv.zheng@intel.com \
--to=lv.zheng@intel.com \
--cc=len.brown@intel.com \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=zetalog@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®