From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Linux PM list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Subject: [PATCH 4/7] cpufreq: Drop unused dev argument from two functions
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 16:05:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1650994.NqTPmayJcx@vostro.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3874727.Jpay9zgokc@vostro.rjw.lan>
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The dev argument of cpufreq_add_policy_cpu() and
cpufreq_add_dev_interface() is not used by any of them,
so drop it.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 10 ++++------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -999,8 +999,7 @@ static void cpufreq_remove_dev_symlink(s
}
}
-static int cpufreq_add_dev_interface(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
- struct device *dev)
+static int cpufreq_add_dev_interface(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
{
struct freq_attr **drv_attr;
int ret = 0;
@@ -1057,8 +1056,7 @@ static int cpufreq_init_policy(struct cp
return cpufreq_set_policy(policy, &new_policy);
}
-static int cpufreq_add_policy_cpu(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
- unsigned int cpu, struct device *dev)
+static int cpufreq_add_policy_cpu(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int cpu)
{
int ret = 0;
@@ -1225,7 +1223,7 @@ static int cpufreq_add_dev(struct device
if (policy) {
WARN_ON(!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, policy->related_cpus));
if (!policy_is_inactive(policy))
- return cpufreq_add_policy_cpu(policy, cpu, dev);
+ return cpufreq_add_policy_cpu(policy, cpu);
/* This is the only online CPU for the policy. Start over. */
recover_policy = true;
@@ -1328,7 +1326,7 @@ static int cpufreq_add_dev(struct device
CPUFREQ_START, policy);
if (!recover_policy) {
- ret = cpufreq_add_dev_interface(policy, dev);
+ ret = cpufreq_add_dev_interface(policy);
if (ret)
goto out_exit_policy;
blocking_notifier_call_chain(&cpufreq_policy_notifier_list,
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-27 13:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-23 0:00 [PATCH 0/2] cpufreq: Better separation of device addition/removal and online/offline paths Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-07-23 0:01 ` [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: Rename two functions related to CPU offline Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-07-23 6:40 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-07-23 0:04 ` [PATCH 2/2] cpufreq: Separate CPU device removal from CPU online Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-07-23 6:39 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-07-23 20:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-07-24 2:19 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-07-24 19:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-07-27 14:01 ` [PATCH 0/7] cpufreq: Better separation of device addition/removal and online/offline paths Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-07-27 14:03 ` [PATCH 1/7] cpufreq: Rework two functions related to CPU offline Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-07-27 14:42 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-07-27 14:03 ` [PATCH 2/7] cpufreq: Drop cpufreq_policy_restore() Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-07-27 14:48 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-07-27 14:04 ` [PATCH 3/7] cpufreq: Drop unnecessary label from cpufreq_add_dev() Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-07-27 14:52 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-07-27 14:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2015-07-27 14:53 ` [PATCH 4/7] cpufreq: Drop unused dev argument from two functions Viresh Kumar
2015-07-27 14:06 ` [PATCH 5/7] cpufreq: Do not update related_cpus on every policy activation Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-07-27 14:56 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-07-27 14:07 ` [PATCH 6/7] cpufreq: Pass CPU number to cpufreq_policy_alloc() Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-07-27 14:58 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-07-27 14:09 ` [PATCH 7/7] cpufreq: Separate CPU device removal from CPU online Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-07-27 15:06 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-07-27 20:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-07-27 21:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-07-28 2:06 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-07-28 14:22 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-07-27 21:55 ` [Update][PATCH 7/7] cpufreq: Separate CPU device registration " Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-07-28 2:20 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-07-28 14:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-07-29 1:03 ` [Update 2x][PATCH " Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-07-29 1:08 ` [PATCH] cpufreq: Replace recover_policy with new_policy in cpufreq_online() Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-07-29 5:38 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-07-29 5:32 ` [Update 2x][PATCH 7/7] cpufreq: Separate CPU device registration from CPU online Viresh Kumar
2015-07-29 14:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2015-07-29 14:07 ` Viresh Kumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1650994.NqTPmayJcx@vostro.rjw.lan \
--to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®