mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
To: akpm@osdl.org, torvalds@osdl.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, anton@samba.org,
	benh@kernel.crashing.org, maneesh@in.ibm.com
Subject: [PATCH][PPC64] Fix incorrect signal handler argument
Date: Sun, 2 May 2004 11:08:30 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <16532.18958.658706.900954@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> (raw)

Andrew & Linus,

This patch fixes a bug in the ppc64 signal delivery code where the
signal number argument to a signal handler can get corrupted before
the handler is called.  The specific scenario is that a process is in
a blocking system call when two signals get generated for it, both of
which have handlers.

The signal code will stack up two signal frames on the process stack
(assuming the mask for the first signal delivered doesn't block the
second signal) and return to userspace to run the handler for the
second signal.  On return from that handler the first handler gets run
with an incorrect signal number argument because we end up with
regs->result still having a negative value (left over from when the
system call was interrupted) when it should be zero.  This patch sets
it to zero when we set up the signal frame (in three places; for
64-bit processes, and for 32-bit processes for RT and non-RT signals).

The way we handle signal delivery and signal handler return using the
regs->result field in ppc64 is more complicated than it needs to be.
In ppc32 I have already simplified it and eliminated use of the
regs->result field.  I am going to do the same in the ppc64 code, but
I think this patch should go in for now to fix the bug.

The patch also fixes a couple of places where we were unnecessarily
and incorrectly truncating the regs->result value to 32 bits
(sys32_sigreturn and sys32_rt_sigreturn return a long value, as all
syscalls do, and if regs->result is negative we need those syscalls to
return a negative value).

Thanks to Maneesh Soni for identifying the specific circumstances
under which this bug shows up.

Please apply.

Thanks,
Paul.

diff -urN ppc64-linux-2.5/arch/ppc64/kernel/signal.c fix/arch/ppc64/kernel/signal.c
--- ppc64-linux-2.5/arch/ppc64/kernel/signal.c	2004-04-20 10:46:36.000000000 +1000
+++ newxmon/arch/ppc64/kernel/signal.c	2004-05-01 20:43:40.193135848 +1000
@@ -430,6 +430,7 @@
 	regs->gpr[1] = newsp;
 	err |= get_user(regs->gpr[2], &funct_desc_ptr->toc);
 	regs->gpr[3] = signr;
+	regs->result = 0;
 	if (ka->sa.sa_flags & SA_SIGINFO) {
 		err |= get_user(regs->gpr[4], (unsigned long *)&frame->pinfo);
 		err |= get_user(regs->gpr[5], (unsigned long *)&frame->puc);
diff -urN ppc64-linux-2.5/arch/ppc64/kernel/signal32.c fix/arch/ppc64/kernel/signal32.c
--- ppc64-linux-2.5/arch/ppc64/kernel/signal32.c	2004-04-23 13:20:12.000000000 +1000
+++ newxmon/arch/ppc64/kernel/signal32.c	2004-05-01 22:51:31.859190440 +1000
@@ -676,6 +676,7 @@
 	regs->nip = (unsigned long) ka->sa.sa_handler;
 	regs->link = (unsigned long) frame->tramp;
 	regs->trap = 0;
+	regs->result = 0;
 
 	return;
 
@@ -784,7 +785,6 @@
 	 */
        	sys32_sigaltstack((u32)(u64)&rt_sf->uc.uc_stack, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, regs);
 
-	regs->result &= 0xFFFFFFFF;
 	ret = regs->result;
 
 	return ret;
@@ -841,6 +841,7 @@
 	regs->nip = (unsigned long) ka->sa.sa_handler;
 	regs->link = (unsigned long) frame->mctx.tramp;
 	regs->trap = 0;
+	regs->result = 0;
 
 	return;
 
@@ -885,7 +886,6 @@
 	    || restore_user_regs(regs, sr, 1))
 		goto badframe;
 
-	regs->result &= 0xFFFFFFFF;
 	ret = regs->result;
 	return ret;
 

             reply	other threads:[~2004-05-02  1:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-05-02  1:08 Paul Mackerras [this message]
2004-05-04  5:46 ` Maneesh Soni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=16532.18958.658706.900954@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com \
    --to=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=anton@samba.org \
    --cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maneesh@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®