From: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
To: raven@themaw.net
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.6-rc3-mm1
Date: Mon, 3 May 2004 12:10:07 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <16534.28383.871208.542553@segfault.boston.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0405032250060.4454@donald.themaw.net>
==> Regarding Re: 2.6.6-rc3-mm1; raven@themaw.net adds:
raven> The case where two process similtaneously trigger a mount in autofs4
raven> can cause multiple requests to the daemon for the same mount. The
raven> daemon handles this OK but it's possible an incorrect error to be
raven> returned. For this reason I believe it is better to change the spin
raven> lock to a semaphore in waitq.c. This makes the second and subsequent
raven> request wait on the q as ther supposed to.
This looks good to me. Do you also need to take the semaphore in
autofs4_catatonic_mode(), around the hijacking of the queue?
void autofs4_catatonic_mode(struct autofs_sb_info *sbi)
{
struct autofs_wait_queue *wq, *nwq;
DPRINTK(("autofs: entering catatonic mode\n"));
sbi->catatonic = 1;
wq = sbi->queues;
sbi->queues = NULL; /* Erase all wait queues */
...
-Jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-05-03 16:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-04-30 8:46 2.6.6-rc3-mm1 Andrew Morton
2004-04-30 13:32 ` 2.6.6-rc3-mm1 Keith Owens
2004-05-01 19:13 ` [PATCH][2.6-mm] Allow i386 to reenable interrupts on lock contention Zwane Mwaikambo
2004-05-01 21:39 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-01 22:21 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2004-05-01 22:51 ` Andrew Morton
2004-05-01 22:58 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2004-04-30 16:23 ` 2.6.6-rc3-mm1 (compile stats) John Cherry
2004-04-30 22:37 ` Greg KH
2004-04-30 22:39 ` Adrian Bunk
2004-05-01 1:55 ` Greg KH
2004-05-01 6:12 ` 2.6.6-rc3-mm1 Bruce Guenter
2004-05-01 10:48 ` 2.6.6-rc3-mm1 R. J. Wysocki
2004-05-01 6:15 ` 2.6.6-rc3-mm1 Ian Kent
2004-05-01 12:10 ` 2.6.6-rc3-mm1 raven
2004-05-01 8:00 ` 2.6.6-rc3-mm1 Harald Arnesen
2004-05-01 11:44 ` 2.6.6-rc3-mm1: modular ACPI button broken Adrian Bunk
2004-05-03 18:36 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2004-05-03 19:21 ` Len Brown
2004-05-01 18:45 ` 2.6.6-rc3-mm1 Joshua Kwan
2004-05-02 0:38 ` 2.6.6-rc3-mm1 Pasi Savolainen
2004-05-02 0:56 ` 2.6.6-rc3-mm1 Andrew Morton
2004-05-02 10:27 ` 2.6.6-rc3-mm1 Nick Piggin
2004-05-03 22:39 ` 2.6.6-rc3-mm1 Pasi Savolainen
2004-05-03 14:49 ` 2.6.6-rc3-mm1 raven
2004-05-03 14:56 ` 2.6.6-rc3-mm1 raven
2004-05-03 16:10 ` Jeff Moyer [this message]
2004-05-04 1:00 ` 2.6.6-rc3-mm1 Ian Kent
2004-05-04 1:53 ` 2.6.6-rc3-mm1 Ian Kent
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=16534.28383.871208.542553@segfault.boston.redhat.com \
--to=jmoyer@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=raven@themaw.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®