From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261752AbUEaJ6u (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 May 2004 05:58:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262007AbUEaJ6u (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 May 2004 05:58:50 -0400 Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.10.76.45]:28627 "EHLO ozlabs.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261752AbUEaJ6t (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 May 2004 05:58:49 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16571.560.788601.739034@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> Date: Mon, 31 May 2004 20:00:16 +1000 From: Paul Mackerras To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Linus Torvalds , Adrian Bunk , Jeff Garzik , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Randy.Dunlap" , Danny ter Haar , wa1ter@myrealbox.com, dth@ncc1701.cistron.net, Netdev , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [patch] Re: Gigabit Kconfig problems with yesterday's update In-Reply-To: <20040531073211.GA4894@infradead.org> References: <40B8A37D.1090802@myrealbox.com> <20040530134544.GE13111@fs.tum.de> <20040530143734.GA24627@dth.net> <20040530094120.61b22d2e.rddunlap@osdl.org> <40BA1F25.4080402@pobox.com> <20040530193706.GG13111@fs.tum.de> <20040531073211.GA4894@infradead.org> X-Mailer: VM 7.18 under Emacs 21.3.1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Christoph Hellwig writes: > Or have a gige chip that's crippled to do only 10/100, like the sungem > on my ibook. I think it is not that the sungem itself is crippled, rather that the phy can only do 10/100. I agree that the division between 10/100 and gigabit ethernet is pretty useless. I note that sungem didn't get put in the gigabit list, for instance. Paul.