mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
To: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: netconsole hangs w/ alt-sysrq-t
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 12:58:22 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <16608.20014.220537.339589@segfault.boston.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040628151954.GH25826@waste.org>

==> Regarding Re: netconsole hangs w/ alt-sysrq-t; Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> adds:

mpm> On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 10:48:41AM -0400, Jeff Moyer wrote:
>> ==> Regarding Re: netconsole hangs w/ alt-sysrq-t; Matt Mackall
>> <mpm@selenic.com> adds:
>> 
>> [snip]
>> 
mpm> Huh. I'm not sure if that covers everything.
>>
mpm> We want to:
>>
mpm> a) push stuff through netpoll_rx() iff rx is enabled b) drop packets
mpm> when netpoll_rx() says to c) drop packets when we're trapped for
mpm> debugging/netdump d) drop packets when we manually call dev->poll e)
mpm> keep as little overhead as possible
>>
mpm> The above breaks (a) when we're not trapped (consider breaking in with
mpm> debugger) and (b) in any case.
>>
mpm> My current thought is we want to get this down to a single test in the
mpm> fastpath by replacing netpoll_rx in skb->dev with a flag that is equal
mpm> to netpoll_trapped() | dev->netpoll_rx, which we manipulate when call
dev-> poll within netpoll.
>>
mpm> How's that sound?
>> That sounds fine.  So, in the netif_receive_skb function, we'd now have
>> something like:
>> 
>> if (skb->dev->netpoll_rx && netpoll_rx(skb)) { kfree_skb(skb); return
>> NET_RX_DROP; }
>> 
>> I removed the test for skb->dev->poll, since this is the NAPI code path,
>> I think it should always be present, right?

mpm> No, I think we get to this on the non-NAPI route as well. The ->poll
mpm> check keeps us from filtering twice.

I'll have to take your word for it on this one, as I can't find a way into
this code for the non-napi case.  Would anyone care to give an
authoritative answer on this?

>> And then at the top of the netpoll_rx routine:
>> 
>> if (!(skb->dev->netpoll_rx & NETPOLL_RX_ENABLED)) goto out;

mpm> Let's explicitly return 1.

Ahh, yes, that makes things much more clear.
 
>> The routine, as before, returns the value of trapped.  And now,
>> netpoll_poll would do this:
>> 
>> if(np->dev->poll && test_bit(__LINK_STATE_RX_SCHED, &np->dev->state)) {
np-> dev->netpoll_rx |= NETPOLL_RX_TRAPPED;
>> if (trapped)
np-> dev->poll(np->dev, &budget);
>> else { trapped = 1;
np-> dev->poll(np->dev, &budget);
>> trapped = 0; }
np-> dev->netpoll_rx &= ~NETPOLL_RX_TRAPPED;
>> }
>> 
>> Is this more in line with what you had in mind?

mpm> Yes. Let's make that NETPOLL_RX_DROP to disambiguate the
mpm> trapped/dropped-for-polling. And we can do a simple
mpm> increment/decrement on trapped itself - but do we still need it here
mpm> now that we've shorted out the NAPI path with RX_DROP?

Right.  The code becomes much cleaner with this change (we don't need to
increment/decrement trapped).

mpm> There might be some new atomicity or memory barrier issues here, be
mpm> mindful.

I'll think about this some more.

>> One thing I would consider changing, here, is having netpoll_set_trap
>> take a struct netpoll argument. That way, we could have netpoll_set_trap
>> manipulate the NETPOLL_RX_TRAPPED bit. This would make the trap specific
>> to each interface, but I think that may be desirable.

mpm> It doesn't really make sense for trapped to be non-global - it means
mpm> the machine is in polling-only mode, eg debugger or the like. It's
mpm> rather misusing it to kill the NAPI receive side for netpoll_poll.

Fair enough.  Attached is a patch with these changes.  I've removed
CONFIG_NETPOLL_RX as it no longer seems useful.  Let me know what you
think.

One other thing we might consider is adding a call to touch_nmi_watchdog()
to zap_completion_queue.

Thanks!

Jeff

--- linux-2.6.7/arch/sparc64/defconfig.orig	2004-06-28 12:37:24.000000000 -0400
+++ linux-2.6.7/arch/sparc64/defconfig	2004-06-28 12:37:27.000000000 -0400
@@ -705,7 +705,6 @@
 #
 CONFIG_NET_PKTGEN=m
 CONFIG_NETPOLL=y
-# CONFIG_NETPOLL_RX is not set
 # CONFIG_NETPOLL_TRAP is not set
 CONFIG_NET_POLL_CONTROLLER=y
 CONFIG_HAMRADIO=y
--- linux-2.6.7/arch/ia64/configs/sn2_defconfig.orig	2004-06-28 12:37:50.000000000 -0400
+++ linux-2.6.7/arch/ia64/configs/sn2_defconfig	2004-06-28 12:37:53.000000000 -0400
@@ -636,7 +636,6 @@
 #
 # CONFIG_BT is not set
 CONFIG_NETPOLL=y
-# CONFIG_NETPOLL_RX is not set
 # CONFIG_NETPOLL_TRAP is not set
 CONFIG_NET_POLL_CONTROLLER=y
 
--- linux-2.6.7/arch/ppc64/configs/pSeries_defconfig.orig	2004-06-28 12:39:00.000000000 -0400
+++ linux-2.6.7/arch/ppc64/configs/pSeries_defconfig	2004-06-28 12:39:03.000000000 -0400
@@ -544,7 +544,6 @@
 #
 # CONFIG_BT is not set
 CONFIG_NETPOLL=y
-CONFIG_NETPOLL_RX=y
 CONFIG_NETPOLL_TRAP=y
 CONFIG_NET_POLL_CONTROLLER=y
 
--- linux-2.6.7/arch/ppc64/configs/iSeries_defconfig.orig	2004-06-28 12:39:19.000000000 -0400
+++ linux-2.6.7/arch/ppc64/configs/iSeries_defconfig	2004-06-28 12:39:23.000000000 -0400
@@ -358,7 +358,6 @@
 #
 # CONFIG_NET_PKTGEN is not set
 CONFIG_NETPOLL=y
-CONFIG_NETPOLL_RX=y
 CONFIG_NETPOLL_TRAP=y
 CONFIG_NET_POLL_CONTROLLER=y
 # CONFIG_HAMRADIO is not set
--- linux-2.6.7/arch/ppc64/defconfig.orig	2004-06-28 12:40:06.000000000 -0400
+++ linux-2.6.7/arch/ppc64/defconfig	2004-06-28 12:40:08.000000000 -0400
@@ -544,8 +544,7 @@
 #
 # CONFIG_BT is not set
 CONFIG_NETPOLL=y
-CONFIG_NETPOLL_RX=y
 CONFIG_NETPOLL_TRAP=y
 CONFIG_NET_POLL_CONTROLLER=y
 
--- linux-2.6.7/arch/x86_64/defconfig.orig	2004-06-28 12:40:21.000000000 -0400
+++ linux-2.6.7/arch/x86_64/defconfig	2004-06-28 12:40:24.000000000 -0400
@@ -399,7 +399,6 @@
 #
 # CONFIG_NET_PKTGEN is not set
 CONFIG_NETPOLL=y
-# CONFIG_NETPOLL_RX is not set
 # CONFIG_NETPOLL_TRAP is not set
 CONFIG_NET_POLL_CONTROLLER=y
 # CONFIG_HAMRADIO is not set
--- linux-2.6.7/include/linux/netdevice.h.orig	2004-06-28 12:05:36.000000000 -0400
+++ linux-2.6.7/include/linux/netdevice.h	2004-06-28 12:13:36.000000000 -0400
@@ -459,7 +459,7 @@
 						     unsigned char *haddr);
 	int			(*neigh_setup)(struct net_device *dev, struct neigh_parms *);
 	int			(*accept_fastpath)(struct net_device *, struct dst_entry*);
-#ifdef CONFIG_NETPOLL_RX
+#ifdef CONFIG_NETPOLL
 	int			netpoll_rx;
 #endif
 #ifdef CONFIG_NET_POLL_CONTROLLER
--- linux-2.6.7/net/core/dev.c.orig	2004-06-28 12:05:22.000000000 -0400
+++ linux-2.6.7/net/core/dev.c	2004-06-28 12:40:52.000000000 -0400
@@ -1575,7 +1575,7 @@
 	struct softnet_data *queue;
 	unsigned long flags;
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_NETPOLL_RX
+#ifdef CONFIG_NETPOLL
 	if (skb->dev->netpoll_rx && netpoll_rx(skb)) {
 		kfree_skb(skb);
 		return NET_RX_DROP;
@@ -1737,7 +1737,7 @@
 	int ret = NET_RX_DROP;
 	unsigned short type;
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_NETPOLL_RX
+#ifdef CONFIG_NETPOLL
 	if (skb->dev->netpoll_rx && skb->dev->poll && netpoll_rx(skb)) {
 		kfree_skb(skb);
 		return NET_RX_DROP;
--- linux-2.6.7/net/core/netpoll.c.orig	2004-06-28 12:05:28.000000000 -0400
+++ linux-2.6.7/net/core/netpoll.c	2004-06-28 12:11:45.000000000 -0400
@@ -29,6 +29,9 @@
 #define MAX_SKBS 32
 #define MAX_UDP_CHUNK 1460
 
+#define NETPOLL_RX_ENABLED  1
+#define NETPOLL_RX_DROP     2
+
 static spinlock_t skb_list_lock = SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED;
 static int nr_skbs;
 static struct sk_buff *skbs;
@@ -70,9 +73,12 @@
 	np->dev->poll_controller(np->dev);
 
 	/* If scheduling is stopped, tickle NAPI bits */
-	if(trapped && np->dev->poll &&
-	   test_bit(__LINK_STATE_RX_SCHED, &np->dev->state))
+	if (np->dev->poll && 
+	    test_bit(__LINK_STATE_RX_SCHED, &np->dev->state)) {
+		np->dev->netpoll_rx |= NETPOLL_RX_DROP;
 		np->dev->poll(np->dev, &budget);
+		np->dev->netpoll_rx &= ~NETPOLL_RX_DROP;
+	}
 	zap_completion_queue();
 }
 
@@ -333,6 +339,9 @@
 	struct list_head *p;
 	unsigned long flags;
 
+	if (!(skb->dev->netpoll_rx & NETPOLL_RX_ENABLED))
+		return 1;
+
 	if (skb->dev->type != ARPHRD_ETHER)
 		goto out;
 
@@ -591,10 +600,7 @@
 	if(np->rx_hook) {
 		unsigned long flags;
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_NETPOLL_RX
-		np->dev->netpoll_rx = 1;
-#endif
-
+		np->dev->netpoll_rx = NETPOLL_RX_ENABLED;
 		spin_lock_irqsave(&rx_list_lock, flags);
 		list_add(&np->rx_list, &rx_list);
 		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rx_list_lock, flags);
@@ -613,9 +619,7 @@
 
 		spin_lock_irqsave(&rx_list_lock, flags);
 		list_del(&np->rx_list);
-#ifdef CONFIG_NETPOLL_RX
-		np->dev->netpoll_rx = 0;
-#endif
+		np->dev->netpoll_rx &= ~NETPOLL_RX_ENABLED;
 		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rx_list_lock, flags);
 	}
 

  reply	other threads:[~2004-06-28 17:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-04-22 15:29 Jeff Moyer
2004-04-25 19:15 ` Matt Mackall
2004-04-28 12:44   ` Jeff Moyer
2004-04-28 14:03     ` Matt Mackall
2004-04-28 14:07       ` Jeff Moyer
2004-04-28 14:27         ` Matt Mackall
2004-04-28 18:23           ` Jeff Moyer
2004-05-20  2:20             ` klogd, netconsole without /dev/console? Tom Oehser
2004-06-25 15:50             ` netconsole hangs w/ alt-sysrq-t Jeff Moyer
2004-06-25 23:27               ` Matt Mackall
2004-06-28 14:48                 ` Jeff Moyer
2004-06-28 15:19                   ` Matt Mackall
2004-06-28 16:58                     ` Jeff Moyer [this message]
2004-06-29 12:36                       ` Jeff Moyer
2004-07-01 16:52                       ` Matt Mackall
2004-07-01 16:54                         ` Jeff Moyer
2004-07-01 17:05                           ` Matt Mackall
2004-07-01 17:53                             ` Jeff Moyer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=16608.20014.220537.339589@segfault.boston.redhat.com \
    --to=jmoyer@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mpm@selenic.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®