From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752901Ab3FXLfv (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Jun 2013 07:35:51 -0400 Received: from hydra.sisk.pl ([212.160.235.94]:48961 "EHLO hydra.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752665Ab3FXLfs (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Jun 2013 07:35:48 -0400 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Viresh Kumar Cc: cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Lists linaro-kernel Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] ARM: CPUFreq updates for 3.11 Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 13:45:15 +0200 Message-ID: <1662523.HdXbLYrd2q@vostro.rjw.lan> User-Agent: KMail/4.9.5 (Linux/3.10.0-rc5+; KDE/4.9.5; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <7195611.gCcafMWC85@vostro.rjw.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday, June 24, 2013 04:40:27 PM Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 24 June 2013 16:29, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > In your original series that patch was the last one. What made you change your > > mind and put it in front? > > I initially thought that this one would break git bisect (code would > compile, but would fail) for platforms whose code I have fixed in > this patchset. > > But that is true only for failure cases, otherwise code would work as > normal. > > And hence kept this at the top this time. Well, it should go last. Also I'd prefer to apply it directly. Please check my comment in there too. Thanks, Rafael -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.