From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S267661AbUHTHxm (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Aug 2004 03:53:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267670AbUHTHxm (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Aug 2004 03:53:42 -0400 Received: from palrel12.hp.com ([156.153.255.237]:10711 "EHLO palrel12.hp.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S267661AbUHTHxi (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Aug 2004 03:53:38 -0400 From: David Mosberger MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16677.44536.108916.524865@napali.hpl.hp.com> Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 00:53:28 -0700 To: Alan Cox Cc: davidm@hpl.hp.com, Jesse Barnes , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: kernbench on 512p In-Reply-To: <1092938120.28370.15.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <200408191216.33667.jbarnes@engr.sgi.com> <16676.54657.220755.148837@napali.hpl.hp.com> <200408191237.16959.jbarnes@engr.sgi.com> <16676.55284.896783.567359@napali.hpl.hp.com> <1092938120.28370.15.camel@localhost.localdomain> X-Mailer: VM 7.18 under Emacs 21.3.1 Reply-To: davidm@hpl.hp.com X-URL: http://www.hpl.hp.com/personal/David_Mosberger/ Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >>>>> On Thu, 19 Aug 2004 18:55:22 +0100, Alan Cox said: Alan> On Iau, 2004-08-19 at 17:40, David Mosberger wrote: >> Why not file a bug-report to Red Hat instead? guile v1.6 and the >> guile-SLIB are quite old and rather standard. Alan> On debian maybe. Alan> The enterprise demand for guile-slib is suprisingly low ;) Ever heard of the chicken-and-egg problem? Is there any good reason _not_ to provide guile-slib? I'm not aware of any. --david