From: Zongmin Zhou <min_halo@163.com>
To: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: i@zenithal.me, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, valentina.manea.m@gmail.com,
Zongmin Zhou <zhouzongmin@kylinos.cn>,
Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] usbip: tools: Add usbip host driver availability check
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2026 11:10:54 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1667ddf5-e36c-4cba-87b4-9cd3d34032e1@163.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3b0aad9f-b424-41b0-9efe-60a1252153f6@linuxfoundation.org>
On 2026/3/28 02:29, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 3/27/26 11:51, Shuah Khan wrote:
>> On 3/27/26 02:39, Zongmin Zhou wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2026/3/27 02:43, Shuah Khan wrote:
>>>> On 3/26/26 02:43, Greg KH wrote:
>>
>> [removed text]
>>
>>>>
>>>> The problem Zongmin is trying fix ish when usbipd starts, it looks for
>>>> exported if any - if it doesn't find any it assumes there aren't any
>>>> exported and doesn't detect that usbip_host driver isn't loaded.
>>>>
>>>> refresh_exported_devices() doesn't have the logic and it shouldn't
>>>> include that logic because this hook is called periodically to
>>>> refresh the list of exported devices. Starting usbipd and loading
>>>> the driver are distinct steps and without any dependencies.
>>>>
>>>> This patch he is trying to add that detection so a message can be
>>>> printed
>>>> to say "load the driver".
>>>>
>>>> A message can be added easily to cover two cases:
>>>>
>>>> 1. usbip_host driver isn't loaded
>>>> 2. There are no exported devices.
>>>>
>>>> refresh_exported_devices() will not find any devices in both
>>>> of the above scenarios. It isn't an error if it can't find
>>>> any exported devices.
>>>>
>>>> An informational message when refresh_exported_devices()
>>>> when it doesn't find any devices could help users.
>>>>
>>>> Zongmin,
>>>>
>>>> Would adding a message that says
>>>> "Check if usbip_host driver is loaded or export devices"
>>>> solve the problem of hard to debug problem you are addressing here?
>>>>
>>> Shuah,
>>>
>>> Your suggestion makes sense.
>>> Adding an informational message when no devices are found would be a
>>> simple
>>> and clean solution that helps users debug without being intrusive.
>>>
>>> However, I plan to add the info() message in
>>> usbip_generic_driver_open() instead of
>>> refresh_exported_devices(), because:
>>> - usbip_generic_driver_open() is called only once at initialization.
>>> - refresh_exported_devices() is called periodically to refresh the
>>> exported device list.
>>
>> refresh_exported_devices() isn't called periodically - it is called
>> from usbip_host_driver op: refresh_device_list and it will be called
>> whenever usbipd (host side) calls it whenever it receives a request from
>> user-space via process_request()
>>
>> For example running "usbip list -l" command will trigger a run of
>> refresh_exported_devices() via usbip_host_driver op: refresh_device_list
>>
>> I don't think it will that noisy to add a message to
>> refresh_exported_devices()
>> when device list is zero. Currently the logic doesn't detect device
>> list zero.
>> You have add that condition to print informational message.
>>
>>
>>> - When the server has no exported devices, having zero devices
>>> is normal and not worth frequent info messages.
>>
>> That is correct. Zero exported devices isn't an error and this could
>> persist until devices are exported.
>>
>>>
>>> Theoretically, we only need to prompt once at startup. Is my
>>> understanding correct?> > I'll also remove the existing error
>>> messages like below,
>>> since they cannot accurately determine whether the driver is loaded:
>>>
>>> if (ret)
>>> err("please load " USBIP_CORE_MOD_NAME ".ko and "
>>> USBIP_HOST_DRV_NAME ".ko!");
>>
>> Leave this one alone, because it gets called from a couple of places.
In usbip_generic_driver_open(), the only path that triggers this message
is a failure of udev_new().
This function fails due to system-level issues like memory exhaustion,
not because usbip driver module is missing.
Furthermore, since refresh_exported_devices() doesn't practically return
an error here,
the message is never seen during actual driver loading failures.
So I think it’s better to remove this inaccurate hint to avoid confusing
the users.
This is the reason why I previously wanted to remove it.
>>
>
> Better yet, why not change the usbip instead - usbip_list for example.
> This is the one that prints the device list and the change can be made
> there when the list is zero to say, "Check if driver is loaded and
> exported devices"
I think placing the check/message in refresh_exported_devices() would be
more effective.
This function covers all scenarios where the device list is refreshed,
including:
usbipd startup, usbip list -r, and usbip attach operations.
This way, users receive helpful feedback automatically without needing
to explicitly run usbip list -r.
>
> thanks,
> -- Shuah
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-30 3:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-03 8:17 [PATCH] " Zongmin Zhou
2026-03-10 22:28 ` Shuah Khan
2026-03-12 2:17 ` Zongmin Zhou
2026-03-23 19:17 ` Shuah Khan
2026-03-25 2:26 ` [PATCH v2] " Zongmin Zhou
2026-03-25 8:58 ` Greg KH
2026-03-26 3:10 ` Zongmin Zhou
2026-03-26 8:43 ` Greg KH
2026-03-26 18:43 ` Shuah Khan
2026-03-27 8:39 ` Zongmin Zhou
2026-03-27 17:51 ` Shuah Khan
2026-03-27 18:29 ` Shuah Khan
2026-03-30 3:10 ` Zongmin Zhou [this message]
2026-03-30 16:44 ` Shuah Khan
2026-03-31 9:58 ` [PATCH v3] usbip: tools: add hint when no exported devices are found Zongmin Zhou
2026-04-01 0:27 ` Shuah Khan
2026-04-01 2:47 ` Zongmin Zhou
2026-04-01 16:06 ` Shuah Khan
2026-04-02 8:32 ` [PATCH v4] " Zongmin Zhou
2026-04-06 21:12 ` Shuah Khan
2026-04-07 2:34 ` Zongmin Zhou
2026-04-09 17:25 ` Shuah Khan
2026-03-11 12:13 ` [PATCH] usbip: tools: Add usbip host driver availability check Greg KH
2026-03-12 2:17 ` Zongmin Zhou
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1667ddf5-e36c-4cba-87b4-9cd3d34032e1@163.com \
--to=min_halo@163.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=i@zenithal.me \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=valentina.manea.m@gmail.com \
--cc=zhouzongmin@kylinos.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®