From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S269718AbUHZWZk (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Aug 2004 18:25:40 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S269727AbUHZWZN (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Aug 2004 18:25:13 -0400 Received: from [213.85.13.118] ([213.85.13.118]:39041 "EHLO tau.rusteko.ru") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S269761AbUHZWWA (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Aug 2004 18:22:00 -0400 From: Nikita Danilov MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16686.25191.635556.817958@gargle.gargle.HOWL> Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 02:21:27 +0400 To: Christophe Saout Cc: Jamie Lokier , Jonathan Abbey , Denis Vlasenko , Rik van Riel , Linus Torvalds , Diego Calleja , christer@weinigel.se, spam@tnonline.net, akpm@osdl.org, wichert@wiggy.net, jra@samba.org, reiser@namesys.com, hch@lst.de, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, flx@namesys.com, reiserfs-list@namesys.com Subject: Re: silent semantic changes with reiser4 In-Reply-To: <1093556917.13881.78.camel@leto.cs.pocnet.net> References: <200408262128.41326.vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua> <20040826193617.GA21248@arlut.utexas.edu> <20040826201639.GA5733@mail.shareable.org> <1093551956.13881.34.camel@leto.cs.pocnet.net> <16686.23053.559951.815883@thebsh.namesys.com> <1093556917.13881.78.camel@leto.cs.pocnet.net> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (patch 17) "chayote" (+CVS-20040321) XEmacs Lucid Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Christophe Saout writes: > Am Freitag, den 27.08.2004, 01:45 +0400 schrieb Nikita Danilov: > > > > At least in reiser4 they don't have, or at least you can't access them. > > > > They do. > > > > > ln -s foo bar; cd bar/metas shows me the content of foo/metas. > > > > That's because lookup for "bar" performs symlink resolution. > > So I can't access them and it is pointless. ;-) > > BTW, I can do a cd metas/metas/metas/metas/plugin/metas... I don't think > this makes sense. :) Why? foo/metas is a file system object just like foo. It has owner, permission bits, so access to its meta-data should be provided, and uniform way to provide access to the file system object meta-data is to have these little magic files inside metas directory, which is a file system object just like metas. It has owner^@^@^@^@*** - Lisp stack overflow. RESET Nikita. >