From: "tip-bot2 for Ashok Raj" <tip-bot2@linutronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>, Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
"Borislav Petkov (AMD)" <bp@alien8.de>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [tip: x86/microcode] x86/microcode/intel: Do not print microcode revision and processor flags
Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2022 13:51:12 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <167007547263.4906.10472927215347122978.tip-bot2@tip-bot2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221103175901.164783-2-ashok.raj@intel.com>
The following commit has been merged into the x86/microcode branch of tip:
Commit-ID: 5b1586ab064ca24c6a7a6be7a9d0cb9e237ef39a
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/5b1586ab064ca24c6a7a6be7a9d0cb9e237ef39a
Author: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
AuthorDate: Tue, 29 Nov 2022 13:08:26 -08:00
Committer: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
CommitterDate: Sat, 03 Dec 2022 14:41:06 +01:00
x86/microcode/intel: Do not print microcode revision and processor flags
collect_cpu_info() is used to collect the current microcode revision and
processor flags on every CPU.
It had a weird mechanism to try to mimick a "once" functionality in the
sense that, that information should be issued only when it is differing
from the previous CPU.
However (1):
the new calling sequence started doing that in parallel:
microcode_init()
|-> schedule_on_each_cpu(setup_online_cpu)
|-> collect_cpu_info()
resulting in multiple redundant prints:
microcode: sig=0x50654, pf=0x80, revision=0x2006e05
microcode: sig=0x50654, pf=0x80, revision=0x2006e05
microcode: sig=0x50654, pf=0x80, revision=0x2006e05
However (2):
dumping this here is not that important because the kernel does not
support mixed silicon steppings microcode. Finally!
Besides, there is already a pr_info() in microcode_reload_late() that
shows both the old and new revisions.
What is more, the CPU signature (sig=0x50654) and Processor Flags
(pf=0x80) above aren't that useful to the end user, they are available
via /proc/cpuinfo and they don't change anyway.
Remove the redundant pr_info().
[ bp: Heavily massage. ]
Fixes: b6f86689d5b7 ("x86/microcode: Rip out the subsys interface gunk")
Reported-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221103175901.164783-2-ashok.raj@intel.com
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c | 8 --------
1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
index c4a00fb..4f93875 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
@@ -554,7 +554,6 @@ void reload_ucode_intel(void)
static int collect_cpu_info(int cpu_num, struct cpu_signature *csig)
{
- static struct cpu_signature prev;
struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(cpu_num);
unsigned int val[2];
@@ -570,13 +569,6 @@ static int collect_cpu_info(int cpu_num, struct cpu_signature *csig)
csig->rev = c->microcode;
- /* No extra locking on prev, races are harmless. */
- if (csig->sig != prev.sig || csig->pf != prev.pf || csig->rev != prev.rev) {
- pr_info("sig=0x%x, pf=0x%x, revision=0x%x\n",
- csig->sig, csig->pf, csig->rev);
- prev = *csig;
- }
-
return 0;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-03 13:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-03 17:58 [v2 00/13] Make microcode late loading more robust Ashok Raj
2022-11-03 17:58 ` [v2 01/13] x86/microcode/intel: Prevent printing updated microcode rev multiple times Ashok Raj
2022-11-04 11:00 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-11-04 13:53 ` Van De Ven, Arjan
2022-11-04 15:52 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-11-04 18:28 ` Ashok Raj
2022-11-04 20:21 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-11-06 13:35 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-11-07 4:17 ` Ashok Raj
2022-11-07 16:12 ` Ashok Raj
2022-11-07 18:47 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-11-08 23:06 ` Ashok Raj
2022-11-08 23:32 ` Dave Hansen
2022-11-09 9:18 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-12-03 13:51 ` tip-bot2 for Ashok Raj [this message]
2022-11-03 17:58 ` [v2 02/13] x86/microcode/intel: Print old and new rev after early microcode update Ashok Raj
2022-11-03 17:58 ` [v2 03/13] x86/microcode/intel: Fix a hang if early loading microcode fails Ashok Raj
2022-11-09 11:25 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-11-09 16:07 ` Ashok Raj
2022-11-09 23:34 ` Borislav Petkov
2022-11-03 17:58 ` [v2 04/13] x86/microcode: Fix microcode_check() compare after a new uCode update Ashok Raj
2022-11-03 17:58 ` [v2 05/13] x86/microcode: Move late-load warning to earlier where kernel taint happens Ashok Raj
2022-11-03 17:58 ` [v2 06/13] x86/ipi: Support sending NMI_VECTOR as self ipi Ashok Raj
2022-11-03 17:58 ` [v2 07/13] x86/microcode: Place siblings in NMI loop while update in progress Ashok Raj
2022-11-03 17:58 ` [v2 08/13] x86/mce: Warn of a microcode update is in progress when MCE arrives Ashok Raj
2022-11-03 17:58 ` [v2 09/13] x86/microcode/intel: Add minimum required revision to microcode header Ashok Raj
2022-11-03 17:58 ` [v2 10/13] x86/microcode: Add a generic mechanism to declare support for minrev Ashok Raj
2022-11-03 17:58 ` [v2 11/13] x86/microcode/intel: Drop wbinvd() from microcode loading Ashok Raj
2022-11-03 17:59 ` [v2 12/13] x86/microcode: Display revisions only when update is successful Ashok Raj
2022-11-03 17:59 ` [v2 13/13] x86/microcode/intel: Add ability to update microcode even if rev is unchanged Ashok Raj
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=167007547263.4906.10472927215347122978.tip-bot2@tip-bot2 \
--to=tip-bot2@linutronix.de \
--cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®