mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
To: Zwane Mwaikambo <zwane@fsmlabs.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
	William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>,
	Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>, Anton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][5/8] Arch agnostic completely out of line locks / ppc64
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2004 15:42:13 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <16703.60725.153052.169532@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0409021231570.4481@montezuma.fsmlabs.com>

Zwane,

Just got a chance to look at the new out-of-line spinlock stuff
(better late than never :).  I see a couple of problems there.  First,
we now go two levels deep on SMP && PREEMPT: spin_lock is _spin_lock,
which is out of line in kernel/sched.c.  That calls
__preempt_spin_lock, which is out of line in kernel/sched.c, and isn't
in the .text.lock section.  So if we get a timer interrupt in there,
we won't attribute the profile tick to the original caller.

The second problem is that __preempt_spin_lock doesn't do the yield to
the hypervisor which we need to do on shared processor systems.  This
is actually a long-standing problem, not one you have just introduced,
but I have only just noticed it.  I can't make cpu_relax do the yield
because the yield is a directed yield to a specific other virtual cpu
(it says "give the rest of my timeslice to that guy over there") and I
need the value in the lock variable in order to know who is holding
the lock.

Regards,
Paul.

  reply	other threads:[~2004-09-09  5:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-09-03  0:02 Zwane Mwaikambo
2004-09-09  5:42 ` Paul Mackerras [this message]
2004-09-09 12:41   ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2004-09-09 14:54     ` Linus Torvalds
2004-09-09 14:55       ` Linus Torvalds
2004-09-09 15:32         ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2004-09-12  4:59           ` [PATCH] Yielding processor resources during lock contention Zwane Mwaikambo
2004-09-12  5:00             ` Andrew Morton
2004-09-12  5:10               ` Anton Blanchard
2004-09-12  5:13               ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2004-09-12  4:32                 ` Nick Piggin
2004-09-12  5:33                   ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2004-09-12  4:46                     ` Nick Piggin
2004-09-12  5:51                       ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2004-09-12  5:02                         ` Nick Piggin
2004-09-12  6:09                           ` Anton Blanchard
2004-09-12  6:58                             ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-09-12  5:18                 ` Andrew Morton
2004-09-12  5:10             ` Linus Torvalds
2004-09-12  5:27               ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2004-09-13 12:21                 ` [PATCH] Yielding processor resources during lock contention #2 Zwane Mwaikambo
2004-09-12  7:49             ` [PATCH] Yielding processor resources during lock contention Ingo Molnar
2004-09-12 16:10               ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2004-09-12 19:34                 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-09-12 10:10             ` Arnd Bergmann
2004-09-12 10:43               ` Anton Blanchard
2004-09-12 11:12                 ` Arnd Bergmann
2004-09-09 15:43     ` [PATCH][5/8] Arch agnostic completely out of line locks / ppc64 Anton Blanchard
2004-09-09 17:19       ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-09-09 21:38         ` Paul Mackerras
2004-09-09 22:00           ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-09-09 23:36             ` Paul Mackerras
2004-09-10  0:09               ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-09-10  0:21                 ` Linus Torvalds
2004-09-10  0:35                   ` Anton Blanchard
2004-09-10  0:54                     ` Linus Torvalds
2004-09-10  1:42                       ` Anton Blanchard
2004-09-10  1:50                         ` Anton Blanchard
2004-09-10  2:22                           ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-09-10  2:32                             ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-09-10  2:37                               ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-09-10  3:24                             ` Anton Blanchard
2004-09-10  7:40                             ` Ingo Molnar
2004-09-10 12:16                               ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-09-10 12:22                                 ` Ingo Molnar
2004-09-10  3:23                       ` Anton Blanchard
2004-09-10  7:56                         ` Anton Blanchard

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=16703.60725.153052.169532@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com \
    --to=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=anton@samba.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mpm@selenic.com \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    --cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
    --cc=zwane@fsmlabs.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®