From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: "Clément Léger" <clement.leger@bootlin.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of/irq: add missing of_node_put() for interrupt parent node
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2023 10:23:17 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <167405896149.112512.1632034797235809699.robh@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230117144929.423089-1-clement.leger@bootlin.com>
On Tue, 17 Jan 2023 15:49:29 +0100, Clément Léger wrote:
> After calling of_irq_parse_one(), the node provided in the of_phandle_args
> has a refcount increment by one. Add missing of_node_put in of_irq_get()
> to decrement the refcount once used.
>
> Signed-off-by: Clément Léger <clement.leger@bootlin.com>
> ---
>
> While debugging a refcount problem with OF_DYNAMIC enabled (which is
> actually the only case were node refcount are really used), I noticed that
> platform_get_irq() was actually incrementing the refcount of an interrupt
> controller node. Digging into that function shows that it calls
> of_irq_get() which calls of_irq_parse_one() and finally of_irq_parse_raw().
> Since it seems sane that the node returned in the of_phandle_args has a
> refcount incremented, I thought it is better to put the of_node_put() in
> the user even though it was hard to find any user doing so.
>
> drivers/of/irq.c | 12 +++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
Applied, thanks!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-18 16:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-17 14:49 Clément Léger
2023-01-18 16:23 ` Rob Herring [this message]
2023-02-28 23:14 ` Rob Herring
2023-03-01 7:56 ` Clément Léger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=167405896149.112512.1632034797235809699.robh@kernel.org \
--to=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=clement.leger@bootlin.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®