From: "tip-bot2 for Kan Liang" <tip-bot2@linutronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
Michael Petlan <mpetlan@redhat.com>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [tip: perf/core] perf/x86/uncore: Factor out uncore_device_to_die()
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2023 09:49:26 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <167429456670.4906.2068459695458312637.tip-bot2@tip-bot2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230112200105.733466-2-kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
The following commit has been merged into the perf/core branch of tip:
Commit-ID: dbf061b26221fa1a99e6489dd61f5b4ee97a24e8
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/dbf061b26221fa1a99e6489dd61f5b4ee97a24e8
Author: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
AuthorDate: Thu, 12 Jan 2023 12:01:01 -08:00
Committer: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
CommitterDate: Sat, 21 Jan 2023 00:06:11 +01:00
perf/x86/uncore: Factor out uncore_device_to_die()
The same code is used to retrieve the logical die ID with a given PCI
device in both the discovery code and the code that supports a system
with > 8 nodes.
Factor out uncore_device_to_die() to replace the duplicate code.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Tested-by: Michael Petlan <mpetlan@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230112200105.733466-2-kan.liang@linux.intel.com
---
arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.h | 1 +
arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_discovery.c | 16 ++--------------
arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c | 12 +-----------
4 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c
index 459b1aa..eeaa92f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c
@@ -65,6 +65,21 @@ int uncore_die_to_segment(int die)
return bus ? pci_domain_nr(bus) : -EINVAL;
}
+int uncore_device_to_die(struct pci_dev *dev)
+{
+ int node = pcibus_to_node(dev->bus);
+ int cpu;
+
+ for_each_cpu(cpu, cpumask_of_pcibus(dev->bus)) {
+ struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(cpu);
+
+ if (c->initialized && cpu_to_node(cpu) == node)
+ return c->logical_die_id;
+ }
+
+ return -1;
+}
+
static void uncore_free_pcibus_map(void)
{
struct pci2phy_map *map, *tmp;
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.h b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.h
index e278e2e..8d493be 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.h
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.h
@@ -208,6 +208,7 @@ struct pci2phy_map {
struct pci2phy_map *__find_pci2phy_map(int segment);
int uncore_pcibus_to_dieid(struct pci_bus *bus);
int uncore_die_to_segment(int die);
+int uncore_device_to_die(struct pci_dev *dev);
ssize_t uncore_event_show(struct device *dev,
struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf);
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_discovery.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_discovery.c
index 5fd72d4..08af92a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_discovery.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_discovery.c
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ static int logical_die_id;
static int get_device_die_id(struct pci_dev *dev)
{
- int cpu, node = pcibus_to_node(dev->bus);
+ int node = pcibus_to_node(dev->bus);
/*
* If the NUMA info is not available, assume that the logical die id is
@@ -43,19 +43,7 @@ static int get_device_die_id(struct pci_dev *dev)
if (node < 0)
return logical_die_id++;
- for_each_cpu(cpu, cpumask_of_node(node)) {
- struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(cpu);
-
- if (c->initialized && cpu_to_node(cpu) == node)
- return c->logical_die_id;
- }
-
- /*
- * All CPUs of a node may be offlined. For this case,
- * the PCI and MMIO type of uncore blocks which are
- * enumerated by the device will be unavailable.
- */
- return -1;
+ return uncore_device_to_die(dev);
}
#define __node_2_type(cur) \
diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c
index 44c2f87..31acc96 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c
@@ -1453,9 +1453,6 @@ static int snbep_pci2phy_map_init(int devid, int nodeid_loc, int idmap_loc, bool
}
raw_spin_unlock(&pci2phy_map_lock);
} else {
- int node = pcibus_to_node(ubox_dev->bus);
- int cpu;
-
segment = pci_domain_nr(ubox_dev->bus);
raw_spin_lock(&pci2phy_map_lock);
map = __find_pci2phy_map(segment);
@@ -1465,15 +1462,8 @@ static int snbep_pci2phy_map_init(int devid, int nodeid_loc, int idmap_loc, bool
break;
}
- die_id = -1;
- for_each_cpu(cpu, cpumask_of_pcibus(ubox_dev->bus)) {
- struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(cpu);
+ map->pbus_to_dieid[bus] = die_id = uncore_device_to_die(ubox_dev);
- if (c->initialized && cpu_to_node(cpu) == node) {
- map->pbus_to_dieid[bus] = die_id = c->logical_die_id;
- break;
- }
- }
raw_spin_unlock(&pci2phy_map_lock);
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(die_id == -1)) {
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-21 9:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-12 20:01 [PATCH RESEND 0/5] Fix UPI uncore issue on SPR kan.liang
2023-01-12 20:01 ` [PATCH RESEND 1/5] perf/x86/uncore: Factor out uncore_device_to_die() kan.liang
2023-01-21 9:49 ` tip-bot2 for Kan Liang [this message]
2023-01-12 20:01 ` [PATCH RESEND 2/5] perf/x86/uncore: Fix potential NULL pointer in uncore_get_alias_name kan.liang
2023-01-21 9:49 ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2023-01-12 20:01 ` [PATCH RESEND 3/5] perf/x86/uncore: Ignore broken units in discovery table kan.liang
2023-01-21 9:49 ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2023-01-12 20:01 ` [PATCH RESEND 4/5] perf/x86/uncore: Add a quirk for UPI on SPR kan.liang
2023-01-21 9:49 ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2023-01-12 20:01 ` [PATCH RESEND 5/5] perf/x86/uncore: Don't WARN_ON_ONCE() for a broken discovery table kan.liang
2023-01-21 9:49 ` [tip: perf/core] " tip-bot2 for Kan Liang
2023-01-19 22:03 ` [PATCH RESEND 0/5] Fix UPI uncore issue on SPR Liang, Kan
2023-01-20 11:57 ` Michael Petlan
2023-01-30 12:04 ` Michael Petlan
2023-01-31 17:17 ` Steve Wahl
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=167429456670.4906.2068459695458312637.tip-bot2@tip-bot2 \
--to=tip-bot2@linutronix.de \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mpetlan@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®