From: "tip-bot2 for Ashok Raj" <tip-bot2@linutronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
"Borislav Petkov (AMD)" <bp@alien8.de>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [tip: x86/microcode] x86/microcode: Allow only "1" as a late reload trigger value
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2023 15:57:53 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <167518067379.4906.5578847349116389476.tip-bot2@tip-bot2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230130213955.6046-3-ashok.raj@intel.com>
The following commit has been merged into the x86/microcode branch of tip:
Commit-ID: 25d0dc4b957cc8674f8554e85f18a00467e876d7
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/25d0dc4b957cc8674f8554e85f18a00467e876d7
Author: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
AuthorDate: Mon, 30 Jan 2023 13:39:48 -08:00
Committer: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
CommitterDate: Tue, 31 Jan 2023 16:47:03 +01:00
x86/microcode: Allow only "1" as a late reload trigger value
Microcode gets reloaded late only if "1" is written to the reload file.
However, the code silently treats any other unsigned integer as a
successful write even though no actions are performed to load microcode.
Make the loader more strict to accept only "1" as a trigger value and
return an error otherwise.
[ bp: Massage commit message. ]
Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov (AMD) <bp@alien8.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230130213955.6046-3-ashok.raj@intel.com
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c | 7 ++-----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c
index 61d57d9..fdd1e7e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/core.c
@@ -475,11 +475,8 @@ static ssize_t reload_store(struct device *dev,
ssize_t ret = 0;
ret = kstrtoul(buf, 0, &val);
- if (ret)
- return ret;
-
- if (val != 1)
- return size;
+ if (ret || val != 1)
+ return -EINVAL;
cpus_read_lock();
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-31 15:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-30 21:39 [Patch v3 Part2 0/9] x86/microcode: Declare microcode safe for late loading Ashok Raj
2023-01-30 21:39 ` [Patch v3 Part2 1/9] x86/microcode: Taint kernel only if microcode loading was successful Ashok Raj
2023-01-31 11:50 ` Borislav Petkov
2023-01-31 16:51 ` Ashok Raj
2023-01-31 20:20 ` Borislav Petkov
2023-01-31 22:54 ` Ashok Raj
2023-02-01 12:44 ` Borislav Petkov
2023-02-01 15:42 ` Ashok Raj
2023-02-01 21:47 ` Ashok Raj
2023-02-01 22:06 ` Borislav Petkov
2023-02-01 22:19 ` Ashok Raj
2023-02-01 22:26 ` Borislav Petkov
2023-01-31 12:17 ` Li, Aubrey
2023-01-31 15:32 ` Ashok Raj
2023-01-30 21:39 ` [Patch v3 Part2 2/9] x86/microcode: Report invalid writes to reload sysfs file Ashok Raj
2023-01-31 15:57 ` tip-bot2 for Ashok Raj [this message]
2023-01-30 21:39 ` [Patch v3 Part2 3/9] x86/microcode/intel: Fix collect_cpu_info() to reflect current microcode Ashok Raj
2023-01-31 16:48 ` Borislav Petkov
2023-01-31 17:34 ` Luck, Tony
2023-01-31 17:41 ` Ashok Raj
2023-01-31 20:40 ` Borislav Petkov
2023-01-31 20:49 ` Luck, Tony
2023-01-31 21:08 ` Borislav Petkov
2023-01-31 22:32 ` Ashok Raj
2023-01-31 22:43 ` Luck, Tony
2023-02-01 12:53 ` Borislav Petkov
2023-02-01 15:13 ` Ashok Raj
2023-02-01 15:25 ` Borislav Petkov
2023-02-01 16:15 ` Luck, Tony
2023-02-01 19:13 ` Dave Hansen
2023-02-01 19:32 ` Ashok Raj
2023-01-30 21:39 ` [Patch v3 Part2 4/9] x86/microcode: Do not call apply_microcode() on sibling threads Ashok Raj
2023-02-01 22:21 ` Dave Hansen
2023-02-01 22:40 ` Borislav Petkov
2023-02-02 2:51 ` Ashok Raj
2023-02-02 9:40 ` Borislav Petkov
2023-02-02 16:34 ` Ashok Raj
2023-01-30 21:39 ` [Patch v3 Part2 5/9] x86/microcode: Move late load warning to the same function that taints kernel Ashok Raj
2023-01-30 21:39 ` [Patch v3 Part2 6/9] x86/microcode/intel: Add minimum required revision to microcode header Ashok Raj
2023-01-30 21:39 ` [Patch v3 Part2 7/9] x86/microcode: Add a generic mechanism to declare support for minrev Ashok Raj
2023-01-30 21:39 ` [Patch v3 Part2 8/9] x86/microcode/intel: Drop wbinvd() from microcode loading Ashok Raj
2023-01-30 21:39 ` [Patch v3 Part2 9/9] x86/microcode: Provide an option to override minrev enforcement Ashok Raj
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=167518067379.4906.5578847349116389476.tip-bot2@tip-bot2 \
--to=tip-bot2@linutronix.de \
--cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®