From: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: chao@kernel.org, jaegeuk@kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] f2fs: introduce flush_policy sysfs entry
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2025 16:22:45 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <16753b65-326d-48ba-90d2-476380455199@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aJr0Tk36ZNiCg8mQ@infradead.org>
On 8/12/25 15:59, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2025 at 03:53:54PM +0800, Chao Yu wrote:
>>> What did you use before? At least for older qemu the default was
>>> buffered I/O, which can lead to very expensive fua or flush calls.
>>
>> Previously, I didn't use any cache= option, as manual described, it
>> should equal to cache=wrteback.
>
> Modern qemu actually split the cache option. You absolute want
> cache.direct=on. If you don't do simulated power fail testing by
Yes,
> killing qemu (or run real workloads for the matter, but who does that
> :)) it might make sense to just ignore the flushes with cache.no-flush=on
Yes, I don't care whether data can be persisted to host devices or not,
nor killing qemu for test, so cache.no-flush=on looks good to me as well.
> as well, which is what I do for my test VMs on the laptop.
Thanks for sharing this, it helps. :)
Thanks,
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-12 8:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-07 3:48 Chao Yu
2025-08-07 5:31 ` [f2fs-dev] " Zhiguo Niu
2025-08-11 10:52 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-08-11 13:44 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-08-12 6:39 ` Chao Yu
2025-08-12 6:28 ` Chao Yu
2025-08-12 7:32 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-08-12 7:53 ` Chao Yu
2025-08-12 7:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-08-12 8:22 ` Chao Yu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=16753b65-326d-48ba-90d2-476380455199@kernel.org \
--to=chao@kernel.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®