From: "tip-bot2 for Paul E. McKenney" <tip-bot2@linutronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>, Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [tip: timers/core] clocksource: Improve read-back-delay message
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2023 18:48:33 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <167631411351.4906.13640037074294664636.tip-bot2@tip-bot2> (raw)
The following commit has been merged into the timers/core branch of tip:
Commit-ID: f092eb34b33043152bfb8a4ca01db9a06728261d
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/f092eb34b33043152bfb8a4ca01db9a06728261d
Author: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
AuthorDate: Tue, 13 Dec 2022 13:57:28 -08:00
Committer: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
CommitterDate: Tue, 03 Jan 2023 20:43:45 -08:00
clocksource: Improve read-back-delay message
When cs_watchdog_read() is unable to get a qualifying clocksource read
within the limit set by max_cswd_read_retries, it prints a message
and marks the clocksource under test as unstable. But that message is
unclear to anyone unfamiliar with the code:
clocksource: timekeeping watchdog on CPU13: wd-tsc-wd read-back delay 1000614ns, attempt 3, marking unstable
Therefore, add some context so that the message appears as follows:
clocksource: timekeeping watchdog on CPU13: wd-tsc-wd excessive read-back delay of 1000614ns vs. limit of 125000ns, wd-wd read-back delay only 27ns, attempt 3, marking tsc unstable
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
Cc: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Cc: Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>
---
kernel/time/clocksource.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/time/clocksource.c b/kernel/time/clocksource.c
index a3d19f6..b599149 100644
--- a/kernel/time/clocksource.c
+++ b/kernel/time/clocksource.c
@@ -260,8 +260,8 @@ static enum wd_read_status cs_watchdog_read(struct clocksource *cs, u64 *csnow,
goto skip_test;
}
- pr_warn("timekeeping watchdog on CPU%d: wd-%s-wd read-back delay of %lldns, attempt %d, marking unstable\n",
- smp_processor_id(), cs->name, wd_delay, nretries);
+ pr_warn("timekeeping watchdog on CPU%d: wd-%s-wd excessive read-back delay of %lldns vs. limit of %ldns, wd-wd read-back delay only %lldns, attempt %d, marking %s unstable\n",
+ smp_processor_id(), cs->name, wd_delay, WATCHDOG_MAX_SKEW, wd_seq_delay, nretries, cs->name);
return WD_READ_UNSTABLE;
skip_test:
reply other threads:[~2023-02-13 18:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=167631411351.4906.13640037074294664636.tip-bot2@tip-bot2 \
--to=tip-bot2@linutronix.de \
--cc=feng.tang@intel.com \
--cc=jstultz@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®