From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
Vipin Sharma <vipinsh@google.com>,
Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/21] KVM: x86/MMU: Formalize the Shadow MMU
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2023 16:02:04 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <167961243530.2554153.5370298632861319341.b4-ty@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230202182809.1929122-1-bgardon@google.com>
On Thu, 02 Feb 2023 18:27:48 +0000, Ben Gardon wrote:
> This series makes the Shadow MMU a distinct part of the KVM x86 MMU,
> implemented in separate files, with a defined interface to common code.
>
> When the TDP (Two Dimensional Paging) MMU was added to x86 KVM, it came in
> a separate file with a (reasonably) clear interface. This lead to many
> points in the KVM MMU like this:
>
> [...]
Applied the first three to kvm-x86 mmu, which just makes me look like a jerk
since they're all my patches. :-(
[01/21] KVM: x86/mmu: Rename slot rmap walkers to add clarity and clean up code
https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/commit/727ae3770132
[02/21] KVM: x86/mmu: Replace comment with an actual lockdep assertion on mmu_lock
https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/commit/eddd9e8302de
[03/21] KVM: x86/mmu: Clean up mmu.c functions that put return type on separate line
https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/commit/f3d90f901d18
--
https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/tree/next
https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/tree/fixes
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-23 23:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-02 18:27 Ben Gardon
2023-02-02 18:27 ` [PATCH 01/21] KVM: x86/mmu: Rename slot rmap walkers to add clarity and clean up code Ben Gardon
2023-02-02 18:27 ` [PATCH 02/21] KVM: x86/mmu: Replace comment with an actual lockdep assertion on mmu_lock Ben Gardon
2023-02-02 18:27 ` [PATCH 03/21] KVM: x86/mmu: Clean up mmu.c functions that put return type on separate line Ben Gardon
2023-02-02 18:27 ` [PATCH 04/21] KVM: x86/MMU: Add shadow_mmu.(c|h) Ben Gardon
2023-02-02 18:27 ` [PATCH 05/21] KVM: x86/MMU: Expose functions for the Shadow MMU Ben Gardon
2023-02-02 18:27 ` [PATCH 06/21] KVM: x86/mmu: Get rid of is_cpuid_PSE36() Ben Gardon
2023-03-20 18:51 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-02-02 18:27 ` [PATCH 07/21] KVM: x86/MMU: Move the Shadow MMU implementation to shadow_mmu.c Ben Gardon
2023-02-02 18:27 ` [PATCH 08/21] KVM: x86/MMU: Expose functions for paging_tmpl.h Ben Gardon
2023-02-02 18:27 ` [PATCH 09/21] KVM: x86/MMU: Move paging_tmpl.h includes to shadow_mmu.c Ben Gardon
2023-03-20 18:41 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-03-21 18:43 ` Ben Gardon
2023-02-02 18:27 ` [PATCH 10/21] KVM: x86/MMU: Clean up Shadow MMU exports Ben Gardon
2023-02-02 18:27 ` [PATCH 11/21] KVM: x86/MMU: Cleanup shrinker interface with Shadow MMU Ben Gardon
2023-02-04 13:52 ` kernel test robot
2023-02-04 19:10 ` kernel test robot
2023-02-02 18:28 ` [PATCH 12/21] KVM: x86/MMU: Clean up naming of exported Shadow MMU functions Ben Gardon
2023-02-02 18:28 ` [PATCH 13/21] KVM: x86/MMU: Fix naming on prepare / commit zap page functions Ben Gardon
2023-02-02 18:28 ` [PATCH 14/21] KVM: x86/MMU: Factor Shadow MMU wrprot / clear dirty ops out of mmu.c Ben Gardon
2023-02-02 18:28 ` [PATCH 15/21] KVM: x86/MMU: Remove unneeded exports from shadow_mmu.c Ben Gardon
2023-02-04 14:44 ` kernel test robot
2023-02-02 18:28 ` [PATCH 16/21] KVM: x86/MMU: Wrap uses of kvm_handle_gfn_range in mmu.c Ben Gardon
2023-02-02 18:28 ` [PATCH 17/21] KVM: x86/MMU: Add kvm_shadow_mmu_ to the last few functions in shadow_mmu.h Ben Gardon
2023-02-02 18:28 ` [PATCH 18/21] KVM: x86/mmu: Move split cache topup functions to shadow_mmu.c Ben Gardon
2023-02-02 18:28 ` [PATCH 19/21] KVM: x86/mmu: Move Shadow MMU part of kvm_mmu_zap_all() to shadow_mmu.h Ben Gardon
2023-02-02 18:28 ` [PATCH 20/21] KVM: x86/mmu: Move Shadow MMU init/teardown to shadow_mmu.c Ben Gardon
2023-02-02 18:28 ` [PATCH 21/21] KVM: x86/mmu: Split out Shadow MMU lockless walk begin/end Ben Gardon
2023-03-20 19:09 ` [PATCH 00/21] KVM: x86/MMU: Formalize the Shadow MMU Sean Christopherson
2023-03-23 23:02 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=167961243530.2554153.5370298632861319341.b4-ty@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=bgardon@google.com \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=ricarkol@google.com \
--cc=vipinsh@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®