mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: KVM: Add common feature flag for AMD's PSFD
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2023 16:38:14 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <167961285281.2555533.5982438178105479790.b4-ty@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230124194519.2893234-1-seanjc@google.com>

On Tue, 24 Jan 2023 19:45:19 +0000, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Use a common X86_FEATURE_* flag for AMD's PSFD, and suppress it from
> /proc/cpuinfo via the standard method of an empty string instead of
> hacking in a one-off "private" #define in KVM.  The request that led to
> KVM defining its own flag was really just that the feature not show up
> in /proc/cpuinfo, and additional patches+discussions in the interim have
> clarified that defining flags in cpufeatures.h purely so that KVM can
> advertise features to userspace is ok so long as the kernel already uses
> a word to track the associated CPUID leaf.
> 
> [...]

Applied to kvm-x86 misc, thanks!

[1/1] x86: KVM: Add common feature flag for AMD's PSFD
      https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/commit/3d8f61bf8bcd

--
https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/tree/next
https://github.com/kvm-x86/linux/tree/fixes

      parent reply	other threads:[~2023-03-24 23:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-24 19:45 Sean Christopherson
2023-01-25 14:03 ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-03-24 23:38 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=167961285281.2555533.5982438178105479790.b4-ty@google.com \
    --to=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®