From: "tip-bot2 for Frederic Weisbecker" <tip-bot2@linutronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [tip: timers/core] selftests/proc: Assert clock_gettime(CLOCK_BOOTTIME) VS /proc/uptime monotonicity
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2023 14:53:27 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <168182960725.404.16948283844933816567.tip-bot2@tip-bot2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230222144649.624380-9-frederic@kernel.org>
The following commit has been merged into the timers/core branch of tip:
Commit-ID: 263dda24fff0957f6b0a9abde2809122f7f0fad8
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/263dda24fff0957f6b0a9abde2809122f7f0fad8
Author: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
AuthorDate: Wed, 22 Feb 2023 15:46:49 +01:00
Committer: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
CommitterDate: Tue, 18 Apr 2023 16:35:13 +02:00
selftests/proc: Assert clock_gettime(CLOCK_BOOTTIME) VS /proc/uptime monotonicity
The first field of /proc/uptime relies on the CLOCK_BOOTTIME clock which
can also be fetched from clock_gettime() API.
Improve the test coverage while verifying the monotonicity of
CLOCK_BOOTTIME accross both interfaces.
Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230222144649.624380-9-frederic@kernel.org
---
tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-uptime-001.c | 21 ++++++++++++----
tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-uptime-002.c | 22 +++++++++++++----
tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-uptime.h | 12 +++++++++-
3 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-uptime-001.c b/tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-uptime-001.c
index 35bddd9..f335eec 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-uptime-001.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-uptime-001.c
@@ -13,9 +13,9 @@
* ACTION OF CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE OR OTHER TORTIOUS ACTION, ARISING OUT OF
* OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE USE OR PERFORMANCE OF THIS SOFTWARE.
*/
-// Test that boottime value in /proc/uptime increments monotonically.
-// We don't test idle time monotonicity due to broken iowait task
-// counting, cf: comment above get_cpu_idle_time_us()
+// Test that boottime value in /proc/uptime and CLOCK_BOOTTIME increment
+// monotonically. We don't test idle time monotonicity due to broken iowait
+// task counting, cf: comment above get_cpu_idle_time_us()
#undef NDEBUG
#include <assert.h>
#include <stdint.h>
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
int main(void)
{
- uint64_t start, u0, u1;
+ uint64_t start, u0, u1, c0, c1;
int fd;
fd = open("/proc/uptime", O_RDONLY);
@@ -35,10 +35,23 @@ int main(void)
u0 = proc_uptime(fd);
start = u0;
+ c0 = clock_boottime();
+
do {
u1 = proc_uptime(fd);
+ c1 = clock_boottime();
+
+ /* Is /proc/uptime monotonic ? */
assert(u1 >= u0);
+
+ /* Is CLOCK_BOOTTIME monotonic ? */
+ assert(c1 >= c0);
+
+ /* Is CLOCK_BOOTTIME VS /proc/uptime monotonic ? */
+ assert(c0 >= u0);
+
u0 = u1;
+ c0 = c1;
} while (u1 - start < 100);
return 0;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-uptime-002.c b/tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-uptime-002.c
index 7ad79d5..ae453da 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-uptime-002.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-uptime-002.c
@@ -13,9 +13,10 @@
* ACTION OF CONTRACT, NEGLIGENCE OR OTHER TORTIOUS ACTION, ARISING OUT OF
* OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE USE OR PERFORMANCE OF THIS SOFTWARE.
*/
-// Test that boottime value in /proc/uptime increments monotonically
-// while shifting across CPUs. We don't test idle time monotonicity
-// due to broken iowait task counting, cf: comment above get_cpu_idle_time_us()
+// Test that boottime value in /proc/uptime and CLOCK_BOOTTIME increment
+// monotonically while shifting across CPUs. We don't test idle time
+// monotonicity due to broken iowait task counting, cf: comment above
+// get_cpu_idle_time_us()
#undef NDEBUG
#include <assert.h>
#include <errno.h>
@@ -43,10 +44,10 @@ static inline int sys_sched_setaffinity(pid_t pid, unsigned int len, unsigned lo
int main(void)
{
+ uint64_t u0, u1, c0, c1;
unsigned int len;
unsigned long *m;
unsigned int cpu;
- uint64_t u0, u1;
int fd;
/* find out "nr_cpu_ids" */
@@ -62,6 +63,8 @@ int main(void)
assert(fd >= 0);
u0 = proc_uptime(fd);
+ c0 = clock_boottime();
+
for (cpu = 0; cpu < len * 8; cpu++) {
memset(m, 0, len);
m[cpu / (8 * sizeof(unsigned long))] |= 1UL << (cpu % (8 * sizeof(unsigned long)));
@@ -70,8 +73,19 @@ int main(void)
sys_sched_setaffinity(0, len, m);
u1 = proc_uptime(fd);
+ c1 = clock_boottime();
+
+ /* Is /proc/uptime monotonic ? */
assert(u1 >= u0);
+
+ /* Is CLOCK_BOOTTIME monotonic ? */
+ assert(c1 >= c0);
+
+ /* Is CLOCK_BOOTTIME VS /proc/uptime monotonic ? */
+ assert(c0 >= u0);
+
u0 = u1;
+ c0 = c1;
}
return 0;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-uptime.h b/tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-uptime.h
index ca55abe..730cce4 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-uptime.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/proc/proc-uptime.h
@@ -19,9 +19,21 @@
#include <string.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <unistd.h>
+#include <time.h>
#include "proc.h"
+static uint64_t clock_boottime(void)
+{
+ struct timespec ts;
+ int err;
+
+ err = clock_gettime(CLOCK_BOOTTIME, &ts);
+ assert(err >= 0);
+
+ return (ts.tv_sec * 100) + (ts.tv_nsec / 10000000);
+}
+
static uint64_t proc_uptime(int fd)
{
uint64_t val1, val2;
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-18 14:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-02-22 14:46 [PATCH 0/8] timers/nohz: Fixes and cleanups v3 Frederic Weisbecker
2023-02-22 14:46 ` [PATCH 1/8] timers/nohz: Restructure and reshuffle struct tick_sched Frederic Weisbecker
2023-04-18 14:53 ` [tip: timers/core] " tip-bot2 for Frederic Weisbecker
2023-02-22 14:46 ` [PATCH 2/8] timers/nohz: Only ever update sleeptime from idle exit Frederic Weisbecker
2023-04-18 14:53 ` [tip: timers/core] " tip-bot2 for Frederic Weisbecker
2023-02-22 14:46 ` [PATCH 3/8] timers/nohz: Protect idle/iowait sleep time under seqcount Frederic Weisbecker
2023-04-18 14:53 ` [tip: timers/core] " tip-bot2 for Frederic Weisbecker
2023-02-22 14:46 ` [PATCH 4/8] timers/nohz: Add a comment about broken iowait counter update race Frederic Weisbecker
2023-04-18 14:53 ` [tip: timers/core] " tip-bot2 for Frederic Weisbecker
2025-11-25 9:36 ` [PATCH 4/8] " Xin Zhao
2023-02-22 14:46 ` [PATCH 5/8] timers/nohz: Remove middle-function __tick_nohz_idle_stop_tick() Frederic Weisbecker
2023-04-18 14:53 ` [tip: timers/core] " tip-bot2 for Frederic Weisbecker
2023-02-22 14:46 ` [PATCH 6/8] MAINTAINERS: Remove stale email address Frederic Weisbecker
2023-04-18 14:53 ` [tip: timers/core] " tip-bot2 for Frederic Weisbecker
2023-02-22 14:46 ` [PATCH 7/8] selftests/proc: Remove idle time monotonicity assertions Frederic Weisbecker
2023-04-18 14:53 ` [tip: timers/core] " tip-bot2 for Frederic Weisbecker
2023-02-22 14:46 ` [PATCH 8/8] selftests/proc: Assert clock_gettime(CLOCK_BOOTTIME) VS /proc/uptime monotonicity Frederic Weisbecker
2023-03-08 15:59 ` Mirsad Todorovac
2023-03-21 12:44 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2023-03-26 20:03 ` Mirsad Goran Todorovac
2023-04-18 14:53 ` tip-bot2 for Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=168182960725.404.16948283844933816567.tip-bot2@tip-bot2 \
--to=tip-bot2@linutronix.de \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®