From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org,
robin.randhawa@arm.com, Steve.Bannister@arm.com,
Liviu.Dudau@arm.com, charles.garcia-tobin@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 4/4] cpufreq: Add Kconfig option to enable/disable have_multiple_policies
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 00:38:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1687194.MelaMkNoiM@vostro.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b3deff3c75a0ca1b687c92bf81061c3728346494.1362381470.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
On Monday, March 04, 2013 03:37:56 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> have_multiple_policies is required by platforms having multiple clock-domains
> for cpus, i.e. supporting multiple policies for cpus. This patch adds in a
> Kconfig option for enabling execution of this code.
>
> Reported-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig | 3 +++
> include/linux/cpufreq.h | 4 ++++
> 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig b/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig
> index cbcb21e..e6e6939 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/Kconfig
> @@ -23,6 +23,9 @@ config CPU_FREQ_TABLE
> config CPU_FREQ_GOV_COMMON
> bool
>
> +config CPU_FREQ_HAVE_MULTIPLE_POLICIES
> + bool
> +
> config CPU_FREQ_STAT
> tristate "CPU frequency translation statistics"
> select CPU_FREQ_TABLE
> diff --git a/include/linux/cpufreq.h b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> index 6e1abd2..a092fcb 100644
> --- a/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> +++ b/include/linux/cpufreq.h
> @@ -107,11 +107,13 @@ struct cpufreq_policy {
> unsigned int policy; /* see above */
> struct cpufreq_governor *governor; /* see below */
> void *governor_data;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_HAVE_MULTIPLE_POLICIES
> /* This should be set by init() of platforms having multiple
> * clock-domains, i.e. supporting multiple policies. With this sysfs
> * directories of governor would be created in cpu/cpu<num>/cpufreq/
> * directory */
> bool have_multiple_policies;
> +#endif
>
> struct work_struct update; /* if update_policy() needs to be
> * called, but you're in IRQ context */
> @@ -142,9 +144,11 @@ static inline bool policy_is_shared(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> static inline struct kobject *
> get_governor_parent_kobj(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_HAVE_MULTIPLE_POLICIES
> if (policy->have_multiple_policies)
> return &policy->kobj;
> else
> +#endif
> return cpufreq_global_kobject;
> }
One more question before I apply it.
Is there any architecture/platform that will set
CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_HAVE_MULTIPLE_POLICIES and keep have_multiple_policies unset
at the same time?
Rafael
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-11 23:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-04 7:37 [PATCH V3 0/4] CPUFreq: Implement per policy instances of governors Viresh Kumar
2013-03-04 7:37 ` [PATCH V3 1/4] cpufreq: Add per policy governor-init/exit infrastructure Viresh Kumar
2013-03-04 7:37 ` [PATCH V3 2/4] cpufreq: governor: Implement per policy instances of governors Viresh Kumar
2013-03-20 5:29 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-03-21 23:44 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-03-22 2:20 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-03-22 11:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-03-22 11:51 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-03-22 12:11 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-03-22 12:05 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-03-26 15:20 ` Jacob Shin
2013-03-26 19:32 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-03-26 19:48 ` Jacob Shin
2013-03-27 4:29 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-03-27 10:04 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-03-27 11:35 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-03-27 14:37 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-03-04 7:37 ` [PATCH V3 3/4] cpufreq: Get rid of "struct global_attr" Viresh Kumar
2013-03-04 7:37 ` [PATCH V3 4/4] cpufreq: Add Kconfig option to enable/disable have_multiple_policies Viresh Kumar
2013-03-11 23:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2013-03-12 0:55 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-03-13 21:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-03-14 3:09 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-03-20 0:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-03-20 4:23 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-03-20 5:16 ` Viresh Kumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1687194.MelaMkNoiM@vostro.rjw.lan \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=Liviu.Dudau@arm.com \
--cc=Steve.Bannister@arm.com \
--cc=charles.garcia-tobin@arm.com \
--cc=cpufreq@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robin.randhawa@arm.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®