From: Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@user.it.uu.se>
To: sct@redhat.com, akpm@osdl.org, adilger@clusterfs.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: ext3 extended attributes refcounting wrong?
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2005 23:42:27 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <16898.43219.133783.439910@alkaid.it.uu.se> (raw)
I believe there is some accounting error in the ext3 code
for the case when CONFIG_EXT3_FS_XATTR is not selected.
Whenever any one of my development boxes triggers an fsck
at boot because some file system, usually /, has been mounted
sufficiently many times, an inconsistency error occurs:
Extended attribute block N has reference count M, should be M'.
where M' is much less than M. As I drop into single-user and
run fsck, it finds at lot occurrences of this error, followed by:
Block bitmap differences ...
and then:
Free blocks count wrong
(always too low, i.e. I have more free blocks than the fs records).
This occurs on all my boxes, with different CPUs (x86/x86-64/ppc)
and different chipsets (Intel, Promise, VIA, Apple), and basically
the only commonalities are:
- they dual boot the most recent 2.4 and 2.6 kernels, and I switch often
- all file systems are ext3
- all XATTR stuff is disabled
/Mikael
next reply other threads:[~2005-02-03 22:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-02-03 22:42 Mikael Pettersson [this message]
2005-02-03 23:36 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2005-02-04 8:25 ` Mikael Pettersson
2005-02-04 10:40 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2005-02-04 13:10 ` Mikael Pettersson
2005-02-04 13:56 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2005-02-04 14:15 ` Mikael Pettersson
2005-02-04 16:19 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2005-02-05 12:39 Mikael Pettersson
2005-02-05 14:20 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2005-02-05 19:49 Mikael Pettersson
2005-02-07 9:23 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=16898.43219.133783.439910@alkaid.it.uu.se \
--to=mikpe@user.it.uu.se \
--cc=adilger@clusterfs.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sct@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®