mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "tip-bot2 for Ingo Molnar" <tip-bot2@linutronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	"Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [tip: sched/core] sched/nohz: Update idle load-balancing (ILB) comments
Date: Mon, 09 Oct 2023 10:26:11 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <169684717152.3135.18417702830973056064.tip-bot2@tip-bot2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231006102518.2452758-2-mingo@kernel.org>

The following commit has been merged into the sched/core branch of tip:

Commit-ID:     7ef7145a2b26b172ac6885c4cf3272a38bc0979a
Gitweb:        https://git.kernel.org/tip/7ef7145a2b26b172ac6885c4cf3272a38bc0979a
Author:        Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
AuthorDate:    Fri, 06 Oct 2023 12:25:16 +02:00
Committer:     Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitterDate: Mon, 09 Oct 2023 12:21:23 +02:00

sched/nohz: Update idle load-balancing (ILB) comments

 - Fix incorrect/misleading comments,

 - clarify some others,

 - fix typos & grammar,

 - and use more consistent style throughout.

Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231006102518.2452758-2-mingo@kernel.org
---
 kernel/sched/fair.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 52c498f..2b63a14 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -11503,14 +11503,15 @@ static inline int on_null_domain(struct rq *rq)
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ_COMMON
 /*
- * idle load balancing details
- * - When one of the busy CPUs notice that there may be an idle rebalancing
+ * NOHZ idle load balancing (ILB) details:
+ *
+ * - When one of the busy CPUs notices that there may be an idle rebalancing
  *   needed, they will kick the idle load balancer, which then does idle
  *   load balancing for all the idle CPUs.
- * - HK_TYPE_MISC CPUs are used for this task, because HK_TYPE_SCHED not set
+ *
+ * - HK_TYPE_MISC CPUs are used for this task, because HK_TYPE_SCHED is not set
  *   anywhere yet.
  */
-
 static inline int find_new_ilb(void)
 {
 	int ilb;
@@ -11531,8 +11532,10 @@ static inline int find_new_ilb(void)
 }
 
 /*
- * Kick a CPU to do the nohz balancing, if it is time for it. We pick any
- * idle CPU in the HK_TYPE_MISC housekeeping set (if there is one).
+ * Kick a CPU to do the NOHZ balancing, if it is time for it, via a cross-CPU
+ * SMP function call (IPI).
+ *
+ * We pick the first idle CPU in the HK_TYPE_MISC housekeeping set (if there is one).
  */
 static void kick_ilb(unsigned int flags)
 {
@@ -11560,7 +11563,7 @@ static void kick_ilb(unsigned int flags)
 
 	/*
 	 * This way we generate an IPI on the target CPU which
-	 * is idle. And the softirq performing nohz idle load balance
+	 * is idle, and the softirq performing NOHZ idle load balancing
 	 * will be run before returning from the IPI.
 	 */
 	smp_call_function_single_async(ilb_cpu, &cpu_rq(ilb_cpu)->nohz_csd);
@@ -11589,7 +11592,7 @@ static void nohz_balancer_kick(struct rq *rq)
 
 	/*
 	 * None are in tickless mode and hence no need for NOHZ idle load
-	 * balancing.
+	 * balancing:
 	 */
 	if (likely(!atomic_read(&nohz.nr_cpus)))
 		return;
@@ -11611,9 +11614,8 @@ static void nohz_balancer_kick(struct rq *rq)
 	sd = rcu_dereference(rq->sd);
 	if (sd) {
 		/*
-		 * If there's a CFS task and the current CPU has reduced
-		 * capacity; kick the ILB to see if there's a better CPU to run
-		 * on.
+		 * If there's a runnable CFS task and the current CPU has reduced
+		 * capacity, kick the ILB to see if there's a better CPU to run on:
 		 */
 		if (rq->cfs.h_nr_running >= 1 && check_cpu_capacity(rq, sd)) {
 			flags = NOHZ_STATS_KICK | NOHZ_BALANCE_KICK;
@@ -11665,11 +11667,11 @@ static void nohz_balancer_kick(struct rq *rq)
 	if (sds) {
 		/*
 		 * If there is an imbalance between LLC domains (IOW we could
-		 * increase the overall cache use), we need some less-loaded LLC
-		 * domain to pull some load. Likewise, we may need to spread
+		 * increase the overall cache utilization), we need a less-loaded LLC
+		 * domain to pull some load from. Likewise, we may need to spread
 		 * load within the current LLC domain (e.g. packed SMT cores but
 		 * other CPUs are idle). We can't really know from here how busy
-		 * the others are - so just get a nohz balance going if it looks
+		 * the others are - so just get a NOHZ balance going if it looks
 		 * like this LLC domain has tasks we could move.
 		 */
 		nr_busy = atomic_read(&sds->nr_busy_cpus);

  reply	other threads:[~2023-10-09 10:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-06 10:25 [PATCH 0/3] sched/nohz: Misc minor cleanups to the NOHZ idle balancing code Ingo Molnar
2023-10-06 10:25 ` [PATCH 1/3] sched/nohz: Update idle load-balancing (ILB) comments Ingo Molnar
2023-10-09 10:26   ` tip-bot2 for Ingo Molnar [this message]
2023-10-09 15:12   ` Valentin Schneider
2023-10-06 10:25 ` [PATCH 2/3] sched/nohz: Use consistent variable names in find_new_ilb() and kick_ilb() Ingo Molnar
2023-10-09 10:26   ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Ingo Molnar
2023-10-09 15:12   ` [PATCH 2/3] " Valentin Schneider
2023-10-06 10:25 ` [PATCH 3/3] sched/nohz: Remove weird error handling from find_new_ilb() Ingo Molnar
2023-10-06 10:38   ` Peter Zijlstra
2023-10-06 11:01     ` Ingo Molnar
2023-10-09 15:11       ` Valentin Schneider
2023-10-09 10:26   ` [tip: sched/core] sched/nohz: Remove unnecessarily complex error handling pattern " tip-bot2 for Ingo Molnar
2023-10-08 16:56 ` [PATCH 0/3] sched/nohz: Misc minor cleanups to the NOHZ idle balancing code Joel Fernandes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=169684717152.3135.18417702830973056064.tip-bot2@tip-bot2 \
    --to=tip-bot2@linutronix.de \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®