From: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
To: leo.yan@linaro.org, mathieu.poirier@linaro.org,
robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: shiwanglai@hisilicon.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/4] coresight: funnel: Support static funnel
Date: Fri, 3 May 2019 16:11:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <16ae9127-b282-e6b8-3a6c-5165c8618bb4@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190412102738.12679-5-leo.yan@linaro.org>
Leo,
On 12/04/2019 11:27, Leo Yan wrote:
> Since CoreSight hardware topology can use a 'hidden' funnel in the
> trace data path, this kind funnel doesn't have register for accessing
> and is used by default from hardware design perspective. Below is an
> example for related hardware topology:
>
> +------+ +------+
> | cpu0 |->| ETM |-\
> +------+ +------+ \-> +--------+ +-----+
> ...... | Funnel |->| ETF |-\ Hidden funnel
> +------+ +------+ /-> +--------+ +-----+ \ |
> | cpu3 |->| ETM |-/ \ V
> +------+ +------+ \-> +--------+
> | Funnel |-> ...
> +------+ +------+ /-> +--------+
> | cpu4 |->| ETM |-\ /
> +------+ +------+ \-> +--------+ +-----+ /
> ...... | Funnel |->| ETF |-/
> +------+ +------+ /-> +--------+ +-----+
> | cpu7 |->| ETM |-/
> +------+ +------+
>
> The CoreSight funnel driver only supports dynamic funnel with
> registration register resource, thus it cannot support for the static
> funnel case and it's impossible to create trace data path for this case.
>
> This patch is to extend CoreSight funnel driver to support both for
> static funnel and dynamic funnel. For the dynamic funnel it reuses the
> code existed in the driver, for static funnel the driver will support
> device probe if without providing register resource and the driver skips
> registers accessing when detect the register base is NULL.
>
> Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
> Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
> Cc: Wanglai Shi <shiwanglai@hisilicon.com>
> Suggested-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
> Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
>
> + if (of_device_is_compatible(np, "arm,coresight-funnel"))
> + pr_warn_once("Uses OBSOLETE CoreSight funnel binding\n");
> +
Given that we now warn about OBSOLETE bindings, please could you fix
the existing DTS in the kernel source tree to use the new binding ?
Similarly for the replicator.
Suzuki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-03 15:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-12 10:27 [PATCH v5 0/4] CoreSight: Support static funnel with DT binding consolidation Leo Yan
2019-04-12 10:27 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] dt-bindings: arm: coresight: Add new compatible for static replicator Leo Yan
2019-04-12 10:40 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2019-04-12 10:54 ` Leo Yan
2019-04-16 20:18 ` Mathieu Poirier
2019-04-17 0:09 ` Leo Yan
2019-04-17 13:57 ` Mathieu Poirier
2019-04-26 14:25 ` Rob Herring
2019-04-26 15:03 ` Mathieu Poirier
2019-04-26 14:25 ` Rob Herring
2019-04-12 10:27 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] coresight: replicator: Add new device id " Leo Yan
2019-04-12 10:41 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2019-04-12 10:27 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] dt-bindings: arm: coresight: Unify funnel DT binding Leo Yan
2019-04-12 10:43 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2019-04-16 20:20 ` Mathieu Poirier
2019-04-26 14:26 ` Rob Herring
2019-04-12 10:27 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] coresight: funnel: Support static funnel Leo Yan
2019-05-03 15:11 ` Suzuki K Poulose [this message]
2019-05-05 1:28 ` Leo Yan
2019-04-26 16:26 ` [PATCH v5 0/4] CoreSight: Support static funnel with DT binding consolidation Mathieu Poirier
2019-04-27 0:20 ` Leo Yan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=16ae9127-b282-e6b8-3a6c-5165c8618bb4@arm.com \
--to=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=leo.yan@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=shiwanglai@hisilicon.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®