mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>
To: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: add an ioctl() to explicitly trigger fsck later
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 09:50:35 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <16b92898-0d8b-8edf-17f4-36b112b25add@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181129015257.95036-1-jaegeuk@kernel.org>

On 2018/11/29 9:52, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> This adds an option in ioctl(F2FS_IOC_SHUTDOWN) in order to trigger fsck by
> setting a NEED_FSCK flag.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
> ---
>  fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 1 +
>  fs/f2fs/file.c | 7 +++++++
>  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> index aa500239baf2..7cec897146a3 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/f2fs.h
> @@ -417,6 +417,7 @@ static inline bool __has_cursum_space(struct f2fs_journal *journal,
>  #define F2FS_GOING_DOWN_METASYNC	0x1	/* going down with metadata */
>  #define F2FS_GOING_DOWN_NOSYNC		0x2	/* going down */
>  #define F2FS_GOING_DOWN_METAFLUSH	0x3	/* going down with meta flush */
> +#define F2FS_GOING_DOWN_NEED_FSCK	0x4	/* going down to trigger fsck */

Why not add a new ioctl interface for this? F2FS_GOING_DOWN_ prefix implies
filesystem will shutdown, IMO, we'd better to keep all sub-interfaces being
consistent in f2fs_ioc_shutdown().

>  
>  #if defined(__KERNEL__) && defined(CONFIG_COMPAT)
>  /*
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/file.c b/fs/f2fs/file.c
> index ff82350a2c55..ca9bdbb8651b 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/file.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/file.c
> @@ -1966,6 +1966,13 @@ static int f2fs_ioc_shutdown(struct file *filp, unsigned long arg)
>  		f2fs_stop_checkpoint(sbi, false);
>  		set_sbi_flag(sbi, SBI_IS_SHUTDOWN);
>  		break;
> +	case F2FS_GOING_DOWN_NEED_FSCK:
> +		set_sbi_flag(sbi, SBI_NEED_FSCK);
> +		/* do checkpoint only */
> +		ret = f2fs_sync_fs(sb, 1);
> +		if (ret)
> +			goto out;

In large-sized image, it may take long time to trigger full scan during
boot, so I'd like to ask how often we set this flag?

Thanks,

> +		break;
>  	default:
>  		ret = -EINVAL;
>  		goto out;
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2018-11-30  1:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-29  1:52 Jaegeuk Kim
2018-11-30  1:50 ` Chao Yu [this message]
2018-11-30 20:36   ` [f2fs-dev] " Jaegeuk Kim
2018-12-07  9:53     ` Chao Yu
2018-12-13  3:56       ` Jaegeuk Kim
2018-12-13  6:30         ` Chao Yu
2018-12-05 19:29 ` Pavel Machek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=16b92898-0d8b-8edf-17f4-36b112b25add@huawei.com \
    --to=yuchao0@huawei.com \
    --cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®