mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@intel.com>,
	Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>,
	Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>,
	Eric Northup <digitaleric@google.com>,
	Dan Rosenberg <drosenberg@vsecurity.com>,
	Julien Tinnes <jln@google.com>, Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] x86: kernel base offset ASLR
Date: Mon, 08 Apr 2013 07:58:23 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <16dc4736-347a-4102-b21b-0e35e060108b@email.android.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130408115823.GC7513@gmail.com>

Not if we do it right, but there is a huge potential boot time penalty.

Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:

>
>* H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> wrote:
>
>> On 04/05/2013 01:04 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> > 
>> > Random runtime shuffling of the kernel image - is that possible
>with 
>> > existing toolchains?
>> > 
>> 
>> Yes... the question is how much work we'd be willing to go through to
>make it 
>> happen.
>> 
>> One approach: the kernel already contains a linker -- used for
>modules -- and 
>> the bulk of the kernel could actually be composed to a "pile of
>modules" that 
>> gets linked on boot.  This would provide very large amounts of
>randomness.
>
>Is there no code generation / micro-performance disadvantage to that?
>
>Thanks,
>
>	Ingo

-- 
Sent from my mobile phone. Please excuse brevity and lack of formatting.

  reply	other threads:[~2013-04-08 14:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-04-04 20:07 [PATCH 0/3] kernel ASLR Kees Cook
2013-04-04 20:07 ` [PATCH 1/3] x86: routines to choose random kernel base offset Kees Cook
2013-04-05  7:24   ` Ingo Molnar
2013-04-05  7:36     ` Ingo Molnar
2013-04-05 18:15       ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-04-04 20:07 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86: build reloc tool for both 64 and 32 bit Kees Cook
2013-04-05  7:13   ` Ingo Molnar
2013-04-04 20:07 ` [PATCH 3/3] x86: kernel base offset ASLR Kees Cook
2013-04-04 20:12   ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-04-04 20:19     ` Julien Tinnes
2013-04-04 20:23       ` Julien Tinnes
2013-04-04 20:27         ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-04-04 20:48           ` Julien Tinnes
2013-04-05  7:05             ` Ingo Molnar
2013-04-04 20:54     ` Kees Cook
2013-04-04 20:58       ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-04-04 21:00         ` Kees Cook
2013-04-04 21:01           ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-04-04 21:04             ` Eric Northup
2013-04-04 21:06             ` Kees Cook
2013-04-04 21:00         ` Julien Tinnes
2013-04-04 21:01         ` Eric Northup
2013-04-05  7:55           ` Ingo Molnar
2013-04-04 20:21   ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-04-04 20:47     ` Eric Northup
2013-04-05  1:08       ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-04-05  8:04     ` Ingo Molnar
2013-04-05 15:30       ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-04-08 11:58         ` Ingo Molnar
2013-04-08 14:58           ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2013-04-05 18:17       ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-04-05 20:01     ` Yinghai Lu
2013-04-05 20:05       ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-04-05 20:19         ` Yinghai Lu
2013-04-05 20:29           ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-04-05  7:11   ` Ingo Molnar
2013-04-05 22:06     ` Julien Tinnes
2013-04-05 22:08       ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-04-05 22:13         ` Julien Tinnes
2013-04-05  7:34   ` Ingo Molnar
2013-04-05 12:12   ` Jiri Kosina
2013-04-05 14:49   ` Borislav Petkov
2013-04-05 20:19     ` Julien Tinnes
2013-04-05 20:43       ` Borislav Petkov
2013-04-05 23:18         ` Kees Cook
2013-04-06 10:10           ` Borislav Petkov
2013-04-08 12:13         ` Ingo Molnar
2013-04-11 20:52 ` [PATCH 0/3] kernel ASLR H. Peter Anvin
2013-04-11 21:28   ` Kees Cook

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=16dc4736-347a-4102-b21b-0e35e060108b@email.android.com \
    --to=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=digitaleric@google.com \
    --cc=drosenberg@vsecurity.com \
    --cc=jarkko.sakkinen@intel.com \
    --cc=jln@google.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matt.fleming@intel.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=mjg@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=wad@chromium.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®