From: Fei Li <lifei.shirley@bytedance.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, liran.alon@oracle.com,
hpa@zytor.com, wanpeng.li@hotmail.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [External] Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: Latch INITs only in specific CPU states in KVM_SET_VCPU_EVENTS
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2025 12:15:04 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <16fb786e-94d7-4093-a62c-39e9a2c26599@bytedance.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aL8A7WKHfAsAkPlh@google.com>
On 9/9/25 12:14 AM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 08, 2025, Fei Li wrote:
>>
>> On 9/5/25 10:59 PM, Fei Li wrote:
>>>
>>> On 8/29/25 12:44 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 5:13 PM Fei Li <lifei.shirley@bytedance.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> Actually this is a bug triggered by one monitor tool in our production
>>>>> environment. This monitor executes 'info registers -a' hmp at a fixed
>>>>> frequency, even during VM startup process, which makes some AP stay in
>>>>> KVM_MP_STATE_UNINITIALIZED forever. But this race only occurs with
>>>>> extremely low probability, about 1~2 VM hangs per week.
>>>>>
>>>>> Considering other emulators, like cloud-hypervisor and
>>>>> firecracker maybe
>>>>> also have similar potential race issues, I think KVM had better do some
>>>>> handling. But anyway, I will check Qemu code to avoid such race. Thanks
>>>>> for both of your comments. 🙂
>>>> If you can check whether other emulators invoke KVM_SET_VCPU_EVENTS in
>>>> similar cases, that of course would help understanding the situation
>>>> better.
>>>>
>>>> In QEMU, it is possible to delay KVM_GET_VCPU_EVENTS until after all
>>>> vCPUs have halted.
>>>>
>>>> Paolo
>>>>
>
> Replacing the original message with a decently formatted version. Please try to
> format your emails for plain text, I assume something in your mail system inserted
> a pile of line wraps and made the entire thing all but unreadable.
Sure, sorry for the inconvenience.
>
>>> `info registers -a` hmp per 2ms[1]
>>> AP(vcpu1) thread[2]
>>> BSP(vcpu0) send INIT/SIPI[3]
>>>
>>> [1] for each cpu: cpu_synchronize_state
>>> if !qemu_thread_is_self()
>>> 1. insert to cpu->work_list, and handle asynchronously
>>> 2. then kick the AP(vcpu1) by sending SIG_IPI/SIGUSR1 signal
>>>
>>> [2] KVM: KVM_RUN and then schedule() in kvm_vcpu_block() loop
>>> KVM: checks signal_pending, breaks loop and returns -EINTR
>>> Qemu: break kvm_cpu_exec loop, run
>>> 1. qemu_wait_io_event()
>>> => process_queued_cpu_work => cpu->work_list.func()
>>> e.i. do_kvm_cpu_synchronize_state() callback
>>> => kvm_arch_get_registers
>>> => kvm_get_mp_state
>>> /* KVM: get_mpstate also calls kvm_apic_accept_events() to handle INIT and SIPI */
>>> => cpu->vcpu_dirty = true;
>>> // end of qemu_wait_io_event
>>>
>>> [3] SeaBIOS: BSP enters non-root mode and runs reset_vector() in SeaBIOS.
>>> send INIT and then SIPI by writing APIC_ICR during smp_scan
>>> KVM: BSP(vcpu0) exits, then
>>> => handle_apic_write
>>> => kvm_lapic_reg_write
>>> => kvm_apic_send_ipi to all APs
>>> => for each AP: __apic_accept_irq, e.g. for AP(vcpu1)
>>> => case APIC_DM_INIT:
>>> apic->pending_events = (1UL << KVM_APIC_INIT) (not kick the AP yet)
>>> => case APIC_DM_STARTUP:
>>> set_bit(KVM_APIC_SIPI, &apic->pending_events) (not kick the AP yet)
>>>
>>> [2] 2. kvm_cpu_exec()
>>> => if (cpu->vcpu_dirty):
>>> => kvm_arch_put_registers
>>> => kvm_put_vcpu_events
>>> KVM: kvm_vcpu_ioctl_x86_set_vcpu_events
>>> => clear_bit(KVM_APIC_INIT, &vcpu->arch.apic->pending_events);
>>> e.i. pending_events changes from 11b to 10b
>>> // end of kvm_vcpu_ioctl_x86_set_vcpu_events
>
> Qemu is clearly "putting" stale data here.
>
>>> Qemu: => after put_registers, cpu->vcpu_dirty = false;
>>> => kvm_vcpu_ioctl(cpu, KVM_RUN, 0)
>>> KVM: KVM_RUN
>>> => schedule() in kvm_vcpu_block() until Qemu's next SIG_IPI/SIGUSR1 signal
>>> /* But AP(vcpu1)'s mp_state will never change from KVM_MP_STATE_UNINITIALIZED
>>> to KVM_MP_STATE_INIT_RECEIVED, even then to KVM_MP_STATE_RUNNABLE without
>>> handling INIT inside kvm_apic_accept_events(), considering BSP will never
>>> send INIT/SIPI again during smp_scan. Then AP(vcpu1) will never enter
>>> non-root mode */
>>>
>>> [3] SeaBIOS: waits CountCPUs == expected_cpus_count and loops forever
>>> e.i. the AP(vcpu1) stays: EIP=0000fff0 && CS =f000 ffff0000
>>> and BSP(vcpu0) appears 100% utilized as it is in a while loop.
>
>> By the way, this doesn't seem to be a Qemu bug, since calling "info
>> registers -a" is allowed regardless of the vcpu state (including when the VM
>> is in the bootloader). Thus the INIT should not be latched in this case.
>
> No, this is a Qemu bug. It is the VMM's responsibility to ensure it doesn't load
> stale data into a vCPU. There is simply no way for KVM to do the right thing,
> because KVM can't know if userspace _wants_ to clobber events versus when userspace
> is racing, as in this case.
>
> E.g. the exact same race exists with NMIs.
>
> 1. kvm_vcpu_ioctl_x86_get_vcpu_events()
> vcpu->arch.nmi_queued = 0
> vcpu->arch.nmi_pending = 0
> kvm_vcpu_events.pending = 0
>
> 2. kvm_inject_nmi()
> vcpu->arch.nmi_queued = 1
> vcpu->arch.nmi_pending = 0
> kvm_vcpu_events.pending = 0
>
> 3. kvm_vcpu_ioctl_x86_set_vcpu_events()
> vcpu->arch.nmi_queued = 0 // Moved to nmi_pending by process_nmi()
> vcpu->arch.nmi_pending = 0 // Explicitly cleared after process_nmi() when KVM_VCPUEVENT_VALID_NMI_PENDING
> kvm_vcpu_events.pending = 0 // Stale data
>
> But for NMI, Qemu avoids clobbering state thinks to a 15+ year old commit that
> specifically avoids clobbering NMI *and SIPI* when not putting "reset" state:
>
> commit ea64305139357e89f58fc05ff5d48dc233d44d87
> Author: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
> AuthorDate: Mon Mar 1 19:10:31 2010 +0100
> Commit: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
> CommitDate: Thu Mar 4 00:29:30 2010 -0300
>
> KVM: x86: Restrict writeback of VCPU state
>
> Do not write nmi_pending, sipi_vector, and mpstate unless we at least go
> through a reset. And TSC as well as KVM wallclocks should only be
> written on full sync, otherwise we risk to drop some time on state
> read-modify-write.
>
> if (level >= KVM_PUT_RESET_STATE) { <=========================
> events.flags |= KVM_VCPUEVENT_VALID_NMI_PENDING;
> if (env->mp_state == KVM_MP_STATE_SIPI_RECEIVED) {
> events.flags |= KVM_VCPUEVENT_VALID_SIPI_VECTOR;
> }
> }
>
> Presumably "SMIs" need the same treatment, e.g.
>
> diff --git a/target/i386/kvm/kvm.c b/target/i386/kvm/kvm.c
> index 6c749d4ee8..f5bc0f9327 100644
> --- a/target/i386/kvm/kvm.c
> +++ b/target/i386/kvm/kvm.c
> @@ -5033,7 +5033,7 @@ static int kvm_put_vcpu_events(X86CPU *cpu, int level)
>
> events.sipi_vector = env->sipi_vector;
>
> - if (has_msr_smbase) {
> + if (has_msr_smbase && level >= KVM_PUT_RESET_STATE) {
> events.flags |= KVM_VCPUEVENT_VALID_SMM;
> events.smi.smm = !!(env->hflags & HF_SMM_MASK);
> events.smi.smm_inside_nmi = !!(env->hflags2 & HF2_SMM_INSIDE_NMI_MASK);
I see, this is indeed a feasible solution. I will send a patch to the
Qemu community then to seek more advises. Thanks for your suggestions.
Have a nice day, thanks a lot
Fei
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-09 4:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-27 15:27 Fei Li
2025-08-27 16:01 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-08-27 16:08 ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-08-28 15:13 ` [External] " Fei Li
2025-08-28 16:44 ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-09-05 14:59 ` Fei Li
2025-09-08 14:55 ` Fei Li
2025-09-08 16:14 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-09-09 4:15 ` Fei Li [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=16fb786e-94d7-4093-a62c-39e9a2c26599@bytedance.com \
--to=lifei.shirley@bytedance.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liran.alon@oracle.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=wanpeng.li@hotmail.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®