mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Fei Li <lifei.shirley@bytedance.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de,
	dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, liran.alon@oracle.com,
	hpa@zytor.com, wanpeng.li@hotmail.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [External] Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: Latch INITs only in specific CPU states in KVM_SET_VCPU_EVENTS
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2025 12:15:04 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <16fb786e-94d7-4093-a62c-39e9a2c26599@bytedance.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aL8A7WKHfAsAkPlh@google.com>



On 9/9/25 12:14 AM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 08, 2025, Fei Li wrote:
>>
>> On 9/5/25 10:59 PM, Fei Li wrote:
>>>
>>> On 8/29/25 12:44 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Aug 28, 2025 at 5:13 PM Fei Li <lifei.shirley@bytedance.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> Actually this is a bug triggered by one monitor tool in our production
>>>>> environment. This monitor executes 'info registers -a' hmp at a fixed
>>>>> frequency, even during VM startup process, which makes some AP stay in
>>>>> KVM_MP_STATE_UNINITIALIZED forever. But this race only occurs with
>>>>> extremely low probability, about 1~2 VM hangs per week.
>>>>>
>>>>> Considering other emulators, like cloud-hypervisor and
>>>>> firecracker maybe
>>>>> also have similar potential race issues, I think KVM had better do some
>>>>> handling. But anyway, I will check Qemu code to avoid such race. Thanks
>>>>> for both of your comments. 🙂
>>>> If you can check whether other emulators invoke KVM_SET_VCPU_EVENTS in
>>>> similar cases, that of course would help understanding the situation
>>>> better.
>>>>
>>>> In QEMU, it is possible to delay KVM_GET_VCPU_EVENTS until after all
>>>> vCPUs have halted.
>>>>
>>>> Paolo
>>>>
> 
> Replacing the original message with a decently formatted version.  Please try to
> format your emails for plain text, I assume something in your mail system inserted
> a pile of line wraps and made the entire thing all but unreadable.

Sure, sorry for the inconvenience.

> 
>>> `info registers -a` hmp per 2ms[1]
>>>                 AP(vcpu1) thread[2]
>>>        BSP(vcpu0) send INIT/SIPI[3]
>>>
>>> [1] for each cpu: cpu_synchronize_state
>>>      if !qemu_thread_is_self()
>>>          1. insert to cpu->work_list, and handle asynchronously
>>>          2. then kick the AP(vcpu1) by sending SIG_IPI/SIGUSR1 signal
>>>
>>> [2] KVM: KVM_RUN and then schedule() in kvm_vcpu_block() loop
>>>           KVM: checks signal_pending, breaks loop and  returns -EINTR
>>>      Qemu: break kvm_cpu_exec loop, run
>>>         1. qemu_wait_io_event()
>>>            => process_queued_cpu_work => cpu->work_list.func()
>>>               e.i. do_kvm_cpu_synchronize_state() callback
>>>            => kvm_arch_get_registers
>>>               => kvm_get_mp_state
>>>                  /* KVM: get_mpstate also calls kvm_apic_accept_events() to handle INIT and SIPI */
>>>                  => cpu->vcpu_dirty = true;
>>>            // end of qemu_wait_io_event
>>>
>>> [3] SeaBIOS: BSP enters non-root mode and runs reset_vector() in SeaBIOS.
>>>      send INIT and then SIPI by writing APIC_ICR during smp_scan
>>>      KVM: BSP(vcpu0) exits, then
>>>      => handle_apic_write
>>>         => kvm_lapic_reg_write
>>>            => kvm_apic_send_ipi to all APs
>>>               => for each AP: __apic_accept_irq, e.g. for AP(vcpu1)
>>>                  => case APIC_DM_INIT:
>>>                     apic->pending_events = (1UL << KVM_APIC_INIT) (not kick the AP yet)
>>>                  => case APIC_DM_STARTUP:
>>>                     set_bit(KVM_APIC_SIPI, &apic->pending_events) (not kick the AP yet)
>>>
>>> [2] 2. kvm_cpu_exec()
>>>         => if (cpu->vcpu_dirty):
>>>            => kvm_arch_put_registers
>>>               => kvm_put_vcpu_events
>>>                  KVM: kvm_vcpu_ioctl_x86_set_vcpu_events
>>>                  => clear_bit(KVM_APIC_INIT, &vcpu->arch.apic->pending_events);
>>>                     e.i. pending_events changes from 11b to 10b
>>>                  // end of kvm_vcpu_ioctl_x86_set_vcpu_events
> 
> Qemu is clearly "putting" stale data here.
> 
>>>      Qemu: => after put_registers, cpu->vcpu_dirty = false;
>>>            => kvm_vcpu_ioctl(cpu, KVM_RUN, 0)
>>>               KVM: KVM_RUN
>>>               => schedule() in kvm_vcpu_block() until Qemu's next SIG_IPI/SIGUSR1 signal
>>>               /* But AP(vcpu1)'s mp_state will never change from KVM_MP_STATE_UNINITIALIZED
>>>                  to KVM_MP_STATE_INIT_RECEIVED, even then to KVM_MP_STATE_RUNNABLE without
>>>                  handling INIT inside kvm_apic_accept_events(), considering BSP will never
>>>                  send INIT/SIPI again during smp_scan. Then AP(vcpu1) will never enter
>>>                  non-root mode */
>>>
>>> [3] SeaBIOS: waits CountCPUs == expected_cpus_count and loops forever
>>>      e.i. the AP(vcpu1) stays: EIP=0000fff0 && CS =f000 ffff0000
>>>      and BSP(vcpu0) appears 100%  utilized as it is in a while loop.
> 
>> By the way, this doesn't seem to be a Qemu bug, since calling "info
>> registers -a" is allowed regardless of the vcpu state (including when the VM
>> is in the bootloader). Thus the INIT should not be latched in this case.
> 
> No, this is a Qemu bug.  It is the VMM's responsibility to ensure it doesn't load
> stale data into a vCPU.  There is simply no way for KVM to do the right thing,
> because KVM can't know if userspace _wants_ to clobber events versus when userspace
> is racing, as in this case.
> 
> E.g. the exact same race exists with NMIs.
> 
>    1. kvm_vcpu_ioctl_x86_get_vcpu_events()
>         vcpu->arch.nmi_queued   = 0
>         vcpu->arch.nmi_pending  = 0
>         kvm_vcpu_events.pending = 0
> 
>    2. kvm_inject_nmi()
>         vcpu->arch.nmi_queued   = 1
>         vcpu->arch.nmi_pending  = 0
>         kvm_vcpu_events.pending = 0
> 
>    3. kvm_vcpu_ioctl_x86_set_vcpu_events()
>         vcpu->arch.nmi_queued   = 0 // Moved to nmi_pending by process_nmi()
>         vcpu->arch.nmi_pending  = 0 // Explicitly cleared after process_nmi() when KVM_VCPUEVENT_VALID_NMI_PENDING
>         kvm_vcpu_events.pending = 0 // Stale data
> 
> But for NMI, Qemu avoids clobbering state thinks to a 15+ year old commit that
> specifically avoids clobbering NMI *and SIPI* when not putting "reset" state:
> 
>    commit ea64305139357e89f58fc05ff5d48dc233d44d87
>    Author:     Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
>    AuthorDate: Mon Mar 1 19:10:31 2010 +0100
>    Commit:     Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
>    CommitDate: Thu Mar 4 00:29:30 2010 -0300
> 
>      KVM: x86: Restrict writeback of VCPU state
>      
>      Do not write nmi_pending, sipi_vector, and mpstate unless we at least go
>      through a reset. And TSC as well as KVM wallclocks should only be
>      written on full sync, otherwise we risk to drop some time on state
>      read-modify-write.
> 
>      if (level >= KVM_PUT_RESET_STATE) {  <=========================
>          events.flags |= KVM_VCPUEVENT_VALID_NMI_PENDING;
>          if (env->mp_state == KVM_MP_STATE_SIPI_RECEIVED) {
>              events.flags |= KVM_VCPUEVENT_VALID_SIPI_VECTOR;
>          }
>      }
> 
> Presumably "SMIs" need the same treatment, e.g.
> 
> diff --git a/target/i386/kvm/kvm.c b/target/i386/kvm/kvm.c
> index 6c749d4ee8..f5bc0f9327 100644
> --- a/target/i386/kvm/kvm.c
> +++ b/target/i386/kvm/kvm.c
> @@ -5033,7 +5033,7 @@ static int kvm_put_vcpu_events(X86CPU *cpu, int level)
>   
>       events.sipi_vector = env->sipi_vector;
>   
> -    if (has_msr_smbase) {
> +    if (has_msr_smbase && level >= KVM_PUT_RESET_STATE) {
>           events.flags |= KVM_VCPUEVENT_VALID_SMM;
>           events.smi.smm = !!(env->hflags & HF_SMM_MASK);
>           events.smi.smm_inside_nmi = !!(env->hflags2 & HF2_SMM_INSIDE_NMI_MASK);

I see, this is indeed a feasible solution. I will send a patch to the 
Qemu community then to seek more advises. Thanks for your suggestions.

Have a nice day, thanks a lot
Fei


      reply	other threads:[~2025-09-09  4:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-27 15:27 Fei Li
2025-08-27 16:01 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-08-27 16:08   ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-08-28 15:13     ` [External] " Fei Li
2025-08-28 16:44       ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-09-05 14:59         ` Fei Li
2025-09-08 14:55           ` Fei Li
2025-09-08 16:14             ` Sean Christopherson
2025-09-09  4:15               ` Fei Li [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=16fb786e-94d7-4093-a62c-39e9a2c26599@bytedance.com \
    --to=lifei.shirley@bytedance.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=liran.alon@oracle.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=wanpeng.li@hotmail.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®