Re: [RESEND PATCH v7 17/21] IB/hns: Add QP operations support

[Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 729 bytes --]

On 05/09/2016 11:04 PM, Lijun Ou wrote:
> +static void hns_roce_v1_cq_clean(struct hns_roce_cq *hr_cq, u32 qpn,
> +				 struct hns_roce_srq *srq)
> +{
> +	spin_lock_irq(&hr_cq->lock);
> +	hns_roce_v1_clean_cq(hr_cq, qpn, srq);
> +	spin_unlock_irq(&hr_cq->lock);
> +}

This is a perfect example of what I was talking about in my last email.
The convention here would be to name the main function
__hns_roce_v1_cq_clean and the wrapper hns_roce_v1_cq_clean.  Instead,
you have one named cq_clean and one named clean_cq.  Keeping straight
which of those locks itself and which needs to be called with the lock
held is nigh impossible.

-- 
Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>
              GPG KeyID: 0E572FDD



[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 884 bytes --]