From: "tip-bot2 for Uros Bizjak" <tip-bot2@linutronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [tip: x86/percpu] x86/callthunks: Handle %rip-relative relocations in call thunk template
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2023 21:16:32 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <170137899278.398.5103495389558631726.tip-bot2@tip-bot2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231105213731.1878100-3-ubizjak@gmail.com>
The following commit has been merged into the x86/percpu branch of tip:
Commit-ID: 17bce3b2ae2d52e8c5c12274ce4c3a631ce9e66b
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/17bce3b2ae2d52e8c5c12274ce4c3a631ce9e66b
Author: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>
AuthorDate: Sun, 05 Nov 2023 22:34:36 +01:00
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
CommitterDate: Thu, 30 Nov 2023 20:06:17 +01:00
x86/callthunks: Handle %rip-relative relocations in call thunk template
Contrary to alternatives, relocations are currently not supported in
call thunk templates. Re-use the existing infrastructure from
alternative.c to allow %rip-relative relocations when copying call
thunk template from its storage location.
The patch allows unification of ASM_INCREMENT_CALL_DEPTH, which already
uses PER_CPU_VAR macro, with INCREMENT_CALL_DEPTH, used in call thunk
template, which is currently limited to use absolute address.
Reuse existing relocation infrastructure from alternative.c.,
as suggested by Peter Zijlstra.
Signed-off-by: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231105213731.1878100-3-ubizjak@gmail.com
---
arch/x86/include/asm/text-patching.h | 2 ++-
arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c | 3 +--
arch/x86/kernel/callthunks.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++------
3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/text-patching.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/text-patching.h
index 29832c3..ba8d900 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/text-patching.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/text-patching.h
@@ -18,6 +18,8 @@ static inline void apply_paravirt(struct paravirt_patch_site *start,
#define __parainstructions_end NULL
#endif
+void apply_relocation(u8 *buf, size_t len, u8 *dest, u8 *src, size_t src_len);
+
/*
* Currently, the max observed size in the kernel code is
* JUMP_LABEL_NOP_SIZE/RELATIVEJUMP_SIZE, which are 5.
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c b/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
index a5ead6a..aa86415 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
@@ -325,8 +325,7 @@ bool need_reloc(unsigned long offset, u8 *src, size_t src_len)
return (target < src || target > src + src_len);
}
-static void __init_or_module noinline
-apply_relocation(u8 *buf, size_t len, u8 *dest, u8 *src, size_t src_len)
+void apply_relocation(u8 *buf, size_t len, u8 *dest, u8 *src, size_t src_len)
{
int prev, target = 0;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/callthunks.c b/arch/x86/kernel/callthunks.c
index c06bfc0..f56fa30 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/callthunks.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/callthunks.c
@@ -24,6 +24,8 @@
static int __initdata_or_module debug_callthunks;
+#define MAX_PATCH_LEN (255-1)
+
#define prdbg(fmt, args...) \
do { \
if (debug_callthunks) \
@@ -184,10 +186,15 @@ static const u8 nops[] = {
static void *patch_dest(void *dest, bool direct)
{
unsigned int tsize = SKL_TMPL_SIZE;
+ u8 insn_buff[MAX_PATCH_LEN];
u8 *pad = dest - tsize;
+ memcpy(insn_buff, skl_call_thunk_template, tsize);
+ apply_relocation(insn_buff, tsize, pad,
+ skl_call_thunk_template, tsize);
+
/* Already patched? */
- if (!bcmp(pad, skl_call_thunk_template, tsize))
+ if (!bcmp(pad, insn_buff, tsize))
return pad;
/* Ensure there are nops */
@@ -197,9 +204,9 @@ static void *patch_dest(void *dest, bool direct)
}
if (direct)
- memcpy(pad, skl_call_thunk_template, tsize);
+ memcpy(pad, insn_buff, tsize);
else
- text_poke_copy_locked(pad, skl_call_thunk_template, tsize, true);
+ text_poke_copy_locked(pad, insn_buff, tsize, true);
return pad;
}
@@ -297,20 +304,27 @@ void *callthunks_translate_call_dest(void *dest)
static bool is_callthunk(void *addr)
{
unsigned int tmpl_size = SKL_TMPL_SIZE;
- void *tmpl = skl_call_thunk_template;
+ u8 insn_buff[MAX_PATCH_LEN];
unsigned long dest;
+ u8 *pad;
dest = roundup((unsigned long)addr, CONFIG_FUNCTION_ALIGNMENT);
if (!thunks_initialized || skip_addr((void *)dest))
return false;
- return !bcmp((void *)(dest - tmpl_size), tmpl, tmpl_size);
+ *pad = dest - tmpl_size;
+
+ memcpy(insn_buff, skl_call_thunk_template, tmpl_size);
+ apply_relocation(insn_buff, tmpl_size, pad,
+ skl_call_thunk_template, tmpl_size);
+
+ return !bcmp(pad, insn_buff, tmpl_size);
}
int x86_call_depth_emit_accounting(u8 **pprog, void *func)
{
unsigned int tmpl_size = SKL_TMPL_SIZE;
- void *tmpl = skl_call_thunk_template;
+ u8 insn_buff[MAX_PATCH_LEN];
if (!thunks_initialized)
return 0;
@@ -319,7 +333,11 @@ int x86_call_depth_emit_accounting(u8 **pprog, void *func)
if (func && is_callthunk(func))
return 0;
- memcpy(*pprog, tmpl, tmpl_size);
+ memcpy(insn_buff, skl_call_thunk_template, tmpl_size);
+ apply_relocation(insn_buff, tmpl_size, *pprog,
+ skl_call_thunk_template, tmpl_size);
+
+ memcpy(*pprog, insn_buff, tmpl_size);
*pprog += tmpl_size;
return tmpl_size;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-30 21:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-05 21:34 [PATCH -tip v2 0/3] x86/callthunks: Fix and unify call thunk assembly snippets Uros Bizjak
2023-11-05 21:34 ` [PATCH -tip v2 1/3] x86/percpu: Define PER_CPU_VAR macro also for !__ASSEMBLY__ Uros Bizjak
2023-11-30 21:16 ` [tip: x86/percpu] " tip-bot2 for Uros Bizjak
2023-11-05 21:34 ` [PATCH -tip v2 2/3] x86/callthunks: Handle %rip-relative relocations in call thunk template Uros Bizjak
2023-11-30 21:16 ` [tip: x86/percpu] x86/callthunks: Mark apply_relocation() as __init_or_module tip-bot2 for Ingo Molnar
2023-12-07 11:15 ` Borislav Petkov
2023-11-30 21:16 ` tip-bot2 for Uros Bizjak [this message]
2023-12-01 3:54 ` [PATCH -tip v2 2/3] x86/callthunks: Handle %rip-relative relocations in call thunk template Nathan Chancellor
2023-12-01 7:48 ` Uros Bizjak
2023-11-05 21:34 ` [PATCH -tip v2 3/3] x86/callthunks: Fix and unify call thunks assembly snippets Uros Bizjak
2023-11-30 21:16 ` [tip: x86/percpu] " tip-bot2 for Uros Bizjak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=170137899278.398.5103495389558631726.tip-bot2@tip-bot2 \
--to=tip-bot2@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=ubizjak@gmail.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®