From: Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>
To: Bhavin Sharma <bhavin.sharma@siliconsignals.io>,
lars@metafoo.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org, mchehab@kernel.org
Cc: bhavin.sharma@siliconsignals.io
Subject: Re: [PATCH] media: adv7180: Fix cppcheck warnings and errors
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2023 11:43:28 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <170376380893.2881109.11558061738942135116@ping.linuxembedded.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231227133516.1356553-1-bhavin.sharma@siliconsignals.io>
Quoting Bhavin Sharma (2023-12-27 13:35:16)
> WARNING: Missing a blank line after declarations
> ERROR: else should follow close brace '}'
>
> Signed-off-by: Bhavin Sharma <bhavin.sharma@siliconsignals.io>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/adv7180.c b/drivers/media/i2c/adv7180.c
> index 54134473186b..91756116eff7 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/i2c/adv7180.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/adv7180.c
> @@ -357,6 +357,7 @@ static int adv7180_querystd(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, v4l2_std_id *std)
> {
> struct adv7180_state *state = to_state(sd);
Personally, I would keep the if (err) hugging the line it's associated
with.
> int err = mutex_lock_interruptible(&state->mutex);
> +
> if (err)
> return err;
>
> @@ -411,6 +412,7 @@ static int adv7180_g_input_status(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, u32 *status)
> {
> struct adv7180_state *state = to_state(sd);
> int ret = mutex_lock_interruptible(&state->mutex);
> +
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> @@ -1046,8 +1048,7 @@ static int adv7182_init(struct adv7180_state *state)
> ADV7180_REG_EXTENDED_OUTPUT_CONTROL,
> 0x17);
> }
> - }
> - else
> + } else
I think kernel code style requires an else clause following a multiline
scope to also have its scope enclosed in braces even if it's a single
statement.
--
Kieran
> adv7180_write(state,
> ADV7180_REG_EXTENDED_OUTPUT_CONTROL,
> 0x07);
> --
> 2.25.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-28 11:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-27 13:35 Bhavin Sharma
2023-12-28 11:43 ` Kieran Bingham [this message]
2023-12-29 13:37 ` Bhavin Sharma
2024-01-01 15:22 ` Kieran Bingham
2024-02-01 12:13 ` Bhavin Sharma
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=170376380893.2881109.11558061738942135116@ping.linuxembedded.co.uk \
--to=kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=bhavin.sharma@siliconsignals.io \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®