From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B020651C59; Mon, 22 Jan 2024 16:25:05 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1705940705; cv=none; b=jCmrT6xm5oE4oYIqkdQYAhNmc3a1ScwUXTD63w7pTfg9gc0vo/ofLYXkpZ+yHkll+CYCbMJSy5l58LsCVDx0o3iYgDaTbcsxEGHPwV+Lxg+Kox5a+vOprySMOedsaBYCl1tnkmrR4n7voCA2pLyY4Fp9IQv0zbQwhIjZ/7eO8+A= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1705940705; c=relaxed/simple; bh=pq2HbRb8pwsAXEdocoGWbwiWnNtqz7+Qzp0W5dDoWI8=; h=From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:Message-Id:Date: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=IyMVC34pv4Q6LXIa0/Br2swRbuER7/DRHdSqslt/kwxbgQGpQrSZJVXkIavMZKucbqKHbVqOLRt5Yk0HxoIkyBoEje9Gzu0dgQ+ja9E+2bvZQamcqUcUepFyGI7P7SnIkV5nF2hS0rSqNRGj5dtDUqRzjRSVxFUrDo5gioHIW9U= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=oaOU9HWz; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="oaOU9HWz" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 30A7DC433F1; Mon, 22 Jan 2024 16:25:01 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1705940705; bh=pq2HbRb8pwsAXEdocoGWbwiWnNtqz7+Qzp0W5dDoWI8=; h=From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:Date:From; b=oaOU9HWzLPiDtd5MB9Zs6wCWRZuHGujEdyog9MrXHvtmPRw+Kluhgc9+3wuJA9dRH ZgpezJlsIFmhtgzt/ja3alQsP4PcTR1i3AKjJ7LJjPYQRR4CoR8mu6EP4nE7hcMEcs QoN6zMaODCu+6+QhNPinhpBbxEC1kUG1zuNj/t0fb0nQxjO7IHl/oO+ARe/kmpt7lg kBXN5ntc6/nLFCfhbu04WgnemRLN8JxCrvH/bcq5+FifKW3AtwMDo+sOnWvspZRJj2 egnCLlDBXH+6d9p31bSGoPhu0zBpenMtitCLg8jXcWdk10yc7WmqsfvB11a96SD70Z S+Fkrj1LH3+2A== From: Vinod Koul To: =?utf-8?q?Uwe_Kleine-K=C3=B6nig?= , Guanhua Gao , Laurentiu Tudor , Ioana Ciornei , Li Zetao , Peng Ma , dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Frank Li Cc: imx@lists.linux.dev In-Reply-To: <20240118162917.2951450-1-Frank.Li@nxp.com> References: <20240118162917.2951450-1-Frank.Li@nxp.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] dmaengine: fsl-dpaa2-qdma: Fix the size of dma pools Message-Id: <170594070183.297861.9047867462367435174.b4-ty@kernel.org> Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 21:55:01 +0530 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: b4 0.12.3 On Thu, 18 Jan 2024 11:29:16 -0500, Frank Li wrote: > In case of long format of qDMA command descriptor, there are one frame > descriptor, three entries in the frame list and two data entries. So the > size of dma_pool_create for these three fields should be the same with > the total size of entries respectively, or the contents may be overwritten > by the next allocated descriptor. > > > [...] Applied, thanks! [1/1] dmaengine: fsl-dpaa2-qdma: Fix the size of dma pools commit: b73e43dcd7a8be26880ef8ff336053b29e79dbc5 Best regards, -- ~Vinod