From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9E8747A40; Mon, 22 Jan 2024 20:35:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1705955715; cv=none; b=okI0R6pWgDx1cjmmFHA6dvwsZb9WwEJuoSbMERYNeodiKMciXxI79fa7XoaFqcuxdKPDXUhl5aGbOetUYmv28TwUt2XXqW5R0FrTis6RvnyQzTBBHJvAfylBA3RLCKdGHlf8GoEZQ1VzdniXZE6t29Dfe7s7N0ExqX+5MXVXnc0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1705955715; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ibfFotzuiwAZb47N/hapoyQ/3VMQ31E1CrfYpEAAork=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=tVmtAPN7B3V9ww33qXm/koCDM3BwanLR/RmoM+C6uUdOkJ7bsUuGBA7CFFhcLhVYet5YQDvzYLkLvHnab5pD6l+ZRxoLIn7xUd+oxNyqbMGeEzbcf9bd5LMYnT1ea1Yks2s+R3ESHa0Onj0bE3MDEzZLF07wWuYIzxnZX/L9isY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=oa1PL9oV; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="oa1PL9oV" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DFF5EC433F1; Mon, 22 Jan 2024 20:35:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1705955715; bh=ibfFotzuiwAZb47N/hapoyQ/3VMQ31E1CrfYpEAAork=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=oa1PL9oVcc6isCJv6ebZu/3r2vyaAFA5Jf3umRLCLYx86S6mJGKBYY3xEQl+6lp4A lFu1nNpceqglMiHgpxJwl3o4cfr5KIUSbG3S+QIFTbpGc+Q70VxmzwNcH60JX0Ce/R ZWfaltx8YQufnP6ki2eRoM0v8dDl9VQUrmshuMtzvHd/lA2I3wv1JBQw4pzAYWwW+5 oxl+EYqQbw1nU0vZ0RKVfv4WXbQw9GPcIR6wZEzdif8xWWor/c66FOfzTsro5F4vQq Hvp0/Hp8xDmNZ8YzslFWgmk8mJ34HAjbXUcdRXX5fvKJVVzjgMdSXWSEbV/aLun5Ow YTMENW94oKWig== From: Namhyung Kim To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Richter , acme@redhat.com, acme@kernel.org Cc: hca@linux.ibm.com, svens@linux.ibm.com, gor@linux.ibm.com, sumanthk@linux.ibm.com Subject: Re: [PING PATCH] perf test: raise limit to 20 percent for perf_stat_--bpf-counters_test Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2024 12:35:11 -0800 Message-ID: <170595558508.377262.16864811982251292801.b4-ty@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.43.0.429.g432eaa2c6b-goog In-Reply-To: <20240108084009.3959211-1-tmricht@linux.ibm.com> References: <20240108084009.3959211-1-tmricht@linux.ibm.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Mon, 8 Jan 2024 09:40:09 +0100, Thomas Richter wrote: > This test case often fails on s390 (about 2 out of 10) because the > 10% percent limit on the difference between --bpf-counters event counting > and s390 hardware counting is more than 10% in all failure cases. > Raise the limit to 20% on s390 and the test case succeeds. > > Applied to perf-tools-next, thanks! Thanks, Namhyung