From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 115A213A25E; Thu, 25 Jan 2024 21:45:05 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706219106; cv=none; b=hL6JzQYNngq/y04UPoInVfPrU9v7pFmSAMjOo5VWrR/qLqbGy2iqkguDRElGYWfR0zr9fWLRIb3rvOpaWoDRQuroTu3EmV6gvq7C46/0zHn326Nt9UWvDV3Lh4KIerdgHbVeWOx1nx5KvV+KfGh1dZyuYq6OYEUiShWnMKYpf9I= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706219106; c=relaxed/simple; bh=JQd1N0cLbwJCRpu8W5IyZC5+ZemZha23KmJar4jpt2o=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Kp3y7xpLj+pN0zgcOq9MfbF96ZONHofutzcLimt3EOok7xQttpIVa2puJp/tzfSFDwuuxFwGXzROXfD6rpmC0nTzCVDhW6wI2lC+WY7usvxVFUWnhpEZzbDvqCnFCMujuxWTkELh1EEoYvIxyRvjMYedVJ9Qh+vEL9S31jMNsAs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=Z44kmTMX; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Z44kmTMX" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EAF25C43390; Thu, 25 Jan 2024 21:45:04 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1706219105; bh=JQd1N0cLbwJCRpu8W5IyZC5+ZemZha23KmJar4jpt2o=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Z44kmTMX6eKCkVGjdG2q+PBh5PXvlqwLzhixVqfzqE7KXJ22Ktmz9zQszRHToGwOK ws2j/h5CdM7E5F0SHsj/f1QxrFSmUji9WfeovgY3qcREzzRHtPhL8Wc831pp/no6hd xZDOPP6/vFIPG7fa4bidMJXX9azcKkmqutV4S6fuJPSIVK9WXLLAz9OCpDuuZky9XF cTxlQ0KhKHlqsfYdBK+44RWzN4t/NDKDcBMFq8u50Z15TYgXF2TFEWb7/+3UenH+fx M+n8fLDKmmUQGhwk9nhILlIAhCfzi1J7aaSLBBQ55n8jXd5cZP9+ellGHC5proxXW2 EsE4qktjP+LiQ== From: Namhyung Kim To: James Clark , linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, irogers@google.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Spoorthy S , Peter Zijlstra , Adrian Hunter , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Alexander Shishkin , Kajol Jain , Mark Rutland , Jiri Olsa , Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] perf test: Skip test_arm_callgraph_fp.sh if unwinding isn't built in Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 13:45:01 -0800 Message-ID: <170621898549.3227482.15120591332128691529.b4-ty@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.43.0.429.g432eaa2c6b-goog In-Reply-To: <20240123163903.350306-1-james.clark@arm.com> References: <20240123163903.350306-1-james.clark@arm.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Tue, 23 Jan 2024 16:39:00 +0000, James Clark wrote: > The first commit outputs the unwinding feature definition in perf > version so that the script can gate on it. And then skip the test if > it's not present. > > I didn't add any fixes tags because it's modifying the perf version > output, requires both commits, and it's just for a test skip change so > I don't think backporting makes sense. > > [...] Applied to perf-tools-next, thanks! Best regards, -- Namhyung Kim