From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C474F747F; Wed, 21 Feb 2024 02:00:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708480815; cv=none; b=IzV9akzuiHrrFv9F2oroiy8QLStzzVViKv7L4UdrKQl+rTJawbpOI8n0p4Nv0ozb3tvqBAGiUfeXIHqJF3TEo/dmXAgE43yU7u89EEYfTesXstt3zOEtud+so925CPdehWYhTN+L7KVNBYYBT2Tg/BvJQkztsCGbIffXky+3ANM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708480815; c=relaxed/simple; bh=CRfAO8B4DzGYtfLCTm5XleHv9ObeYH9Wo1VmI8sIwK0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=WnsOwj11BX+O5RJarlRh2S5LqrZ9nFZnGv+XhccvUvLfAubihYTRvNPbZyY9xF4g/zLJrKGMmmSASaciLi5oMrlBoPWXwfZunUBJDlMRgTqVsmNIGZObWwB2lkbxnXQCBlJFJU26h1YmxP4o99h4At8oPRPetbIbnSvceFrxIJ8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=pQ2GxswR; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="pQ2GxswR" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DBEA3C433C7; Wed, 21 Feb 2024 02:00:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1708480815; bh=CRfAO8B4DzGYtfLCTm5XleHv9ObeYH9Wo1VmI8sIwK0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=pQ2GxswRNmsF4vpZiqBWAFKvJZV9uVGIwbBspL2x8/x3wElIop3fv+XTQoWoISz5S cH9LZ5Whqu0gWniZQN7E7ARein2vdPtMAkiH/S//D7IMesYVnF02oNvDBUfTEs7Ooq 9uh5zNHpaIePnxyqivtz+xfUb/DUoYzA+LRia7tNU6ERDRrDVa9550vPEHSMTZbnF5 EOMbd1VMvKEt40OCm3w73DN1Mf3MNrb+hHpn8YMPfDAaAbSqq5UXzAZWdmOWHdOnlO 6EbHUcc/8I+wKg1ywGNYZGCFt8ks0nyfTSH01sacKHKu0WciWloPH0NJLrq77WpEnI HmrmCzIcWtS1Q== From: Namhyung Kim To: Namhyung Kim , Ian Rogers , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Mark Rutland , LKML , Ingo Molnar , linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, Mike Leach , Will Deacon , Adrian Hunter , Peter Zijlstra , John Garry , Jiri Olsa , Leo Yan Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf tools: Fixup module symbol end address properly Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 18:00:13 -0800 Message-ID: <170848061727.1313505.8320377887775957635.b4-ty@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.44.0.rc0.258.g7320e95886-goog In-Reply-To: <20240212233322.1855161-1-namhyung@kernel.org> References: <20240212233322.1855161-1-namhyung@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 15:33:22 -0800, Namhyung Kim wrote: > I got a strange error on ARM to fail on processing FINISHED_ROUND > record. It turned out that it was failing in symbol__alloc_hist() > because the symbol size is too big. > > When a sample is captured on a specific BPF program, it failed. I've > added a debug code and found the end address of the symbol is from > the next module which is placed far way. > > [...] Applied to perf-tools-next, thanks! [1/1] perf tools: Fixup module symbol end address properly commit: bacefe0c7b77b7527a613e053b6d378412a8a779 Best regards, -- Namhyung Kim