From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ADCBA3A1C2; Fri, 1 Mar 2024 19:30:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709321443; cv=none; b=bEMPHGKtsDMXEZ4qEgOkQjvohwYkYvZAMEzXBRj5TqJmBzXdOqdJ0C7rzOhzyz7YuSv68ZWZRuCpHjdVLWaRezyK9F5DDpNSrk5O+Ch10nnK7yz+epKeeCJQCP/taA83+IzUuePDcbQiuIXd+gvMeW5z6vtjafvVlWUGE26x40U= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1709321443; c=relaxed/simple; bh=2tiUMGVucLnTsfdQmtV4Q/wjRqqk/yhTGxrQh1MIwak=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=gN8wiY/SpideqIhezHLMaPYpWGeorUNvzlYv0/2SVNoy7faxH2LM52nVOsxFA3gtKZPsLxvJnasYJLggXpAEcz0fQueK3J3OXGLxjnVbSjmqa72LAuS61DYERzfeJHbsgpw/n0Z9GF+ng4X+8pmi4P4l6qzblk0wdptObbyJmZI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=AOfMQX4a; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="AOfMQX4a" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CC33DC433C7; Fri, 1 Mar 2024 19:30:42 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1709321443; bh=2tiUMGVucLnTsfdQmtV4Q/wjRqqk/yhTGxrQh1MIwak=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=AOfMQX4a48hOiQtATpUXJXg8Ffm8UIvp3TBzML2FaepaEFuo0Ma1N4CoeuRfTaKsM O8Ic/vhEf09LTzyBkOgLX+1J5Nfli+HujskJYi+DjdwtS12MIyqUD+Rjl18b9ZtXFY rXSu4aZfAu2B/9m7KhFsw17hcOXONj0qiRnw43m5DVLrGM7SSeHQMlNoQM+BXGlSan t0Em5IaW1/DfJopc8OSYvWCwHwlBML6M4/n6TnvHqFLfGKG+MDYoMexma6tQWoTegG 7CRnRzkWd97RVNlW8LW5P/NKTb+MC4c76x/OhgNtgBGmZZq2msm84jyZ5J3SueOz2w 6x/4KMcIzTYsw== From: Namhyung Kim To: Ian Rogers , Peter Zijlstra , Alexander Shishkin , Mark Rutland , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jiri Olsa , Adrian Hunter , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, Yang Jihong , Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] libperf evlist: Avoid out-of-bounds access Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2024 11:30:41 -0800 Message-ID: <170932136988.3731358.14011113608352874223.b4-ty@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.44.0.rc1.240.g4c46232300-goog In-Reply-To: <20240229070757.796244-1-irogers@google.com> References: <20240229070757.796244-1-irogers@google.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Wed, 28 Feb 2024 23:07:57 -0800, Ian Rogers wrote: > Parallel testing appears to show a race between allocating and setting > evsel ids. As there is a bounds check on the xyarray it yields a segv > like: > > ``` > AddressSanitizer:DEADLYSIGNAL > > [...] Applied to perf-tools-next, thanks! Best regards, -- Namhyung Kim