From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59286264638; Thu, 13 Nov 2025 16:34:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1763051678; cv=none; b=Cuc1m9IIIxsdDUR0l2mqW4dd/CKJP1DCFBy+cSuYuxZFy1NeL6wCzMauTcuJfXuTBQQdh5x5kKFWMW4s9xrkFGRsQekOFWVlkaPDKJn/xwdtYLps4VuByIHvaloB6OWW8P6GkXOp3oDxE8o3WO8XC6Ikil+sSlg0L0TC7TMHDr4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1763051678; c=relaxed/simple; bh=NCb9Bzu7WQEFInCd9jw3p7avb4Vai1iqxOM55MGgbK4=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=BFf84Mxm+7c4fn/noOcZfaOWsiiriF5mHEDNtiQKeqsPozxNT7bnwgm7V9BUcELf+xLi0lFx3iE3hoI10LNpzKJNt+ZPmRQ+2yj13OwL5bDVs+QF9a5QWYNTYLGt3SnXRwnF76AYbPwYXyKlxO/eLxCpZ//76Xsy7K5+0BKe8PU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=cRoWUD68; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="cRoWUD68" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1763051677; x=1794587677; h=message-id:date:mime-version:subject:to:cc:references: from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=NCb9Bzu7WQEFInCd9jw3p7avb4Vai1iqxOM55MGgbK4=; b=cRoWUD689igclhNAFdaQENy1Ue4mgrcyuHoM1rXdT6ZOWb1TWfefPNAH PUE3hSFD9lKMEhY2w+HHjWdNfIC8O3Uyqixqx9t4x/SGSel+QSH86CsRG 4G3HN/5hmc9juktUqR8KqZUJpiN2dz7G97OJ9kgSuY/v6PsyRPKVeRDMU r+Ub6nW6avGibVv3+Aw3KEbg7rO7fdVE+EqY/3lhSxtP/agmK477wzk/w kYk6wreUIRdcE/Zb3KvoaXIX2suf7IDfpDdIi024/gAhB4TTExHdte8iY OCDgFBeazwl0mO+05xyrGY2CbFkKZPv3aRoJOyjT7yyQjNIXgSl9m5p8p g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 1wSTAscRRkSGeJbiPVQiiQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: zSP3ZXKxRDaH/jl8KTxtwQ== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11612"; a="64340257" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.19,302,1754982000"; d="scan'208";a="64340257" Received: from orviesa002.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.142]) by fmvoesa112.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 Nov 2025 08:34:37 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: xGP/66LDT/OegyJcqEm0LA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: WTEsHERoT9G6GZqsRCyV8w== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.19,302,1754982000"; d="scan'208";a="220187027" Received: from tslove-mobl4.amr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.125.108.114]) ([10.125.108.114]) by orviesa002-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 Nov 2025 08:34:36 -0800 Message-ID: <170c89c8-ac37-4283-8a1c-6c7c442a1654@intel.com> Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2025 09:34:34 -0700 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] CXL updates for v6.19 To: Gregory Price Cc: Robert Richter , Alison Schofield , Vishal Verma , Ira Weiny , Dan Williams , Jonathan Cameron , Davidlohr Bueso , linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Fabio M. De Francesco" , Terry Bowman , Joshua Hahn References: <20251112205105.1271726-1-rrichter@amd.com> From: Dave Jiang Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 11/13/25 8:32 AM, Gregory Price wrote: > On Thu, Nov 13, 2025 at 08:20:59AM -0700, Dave Jiang wrote: >> On 11/13/25 4:01 AM, Robert Richter wrote: >>> On 12.11.25 14:45:28, Dave Jiang wrote: >>>> >>>> >>> Additionally, patch 3/3 (@inc variable change) of this series also >>> depends on patch 02/11 of v5 (store root decoder in in struct >>> cxl_region). If you chose to pickup some patches from v5 first on top >>> of cxl/next, then all this 3 patches should apply cleanly. >>> >>> Since 02/11 is one of the first patches and it sounded to me some of >>> them will be applied as well, I would prefer that order to avoid >>> rebasing and resubmitting a v6 for that. Let me know if you want to >>> handle this differently. >> >> Hmmm....maybe I should just take the entire series hopefully next cycle when it's ready given all the dependencies? > > As an active user of the Zen5 translation patch (I've been carrying > backports Zen5 support for over a year), I would greatly prefer not > to delay the Zen5 series for the sake of this series. Well if we can have the series applies cleanly on 6.18-rc5 with all the needed review tags and all the outstanding concerns resolved next week, we can go this cycle. I'd like Dan to take a look if he has time though. > > ~Gregory