From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933640AbXCQFha (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 Mar 2007 01:37:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S933664AbXCQFh3 (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 Mar 2007 01:37:29 -0400 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.175]:51316 "EHLO ug-out-1314.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933640AbXCQFh2 (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 Mar 2007 01:37:28 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=S1krko4gSKOtZXLdry5RracPAFZZkPvZDXc2yftgyZJ90n/VyhIZBErS9ssRQXU7eStA8UxeiAdoONdfLWAcIg+DA+o55UyNs+DQQEVmMub53+mvuG6iefvAkQ6KRlCMZouexKZ/JyHKicjRCuvwP6I7ddXTkCWPiKhwlMyawys= Message-ID: <170fa0d20703162237m1023cbd2o8ccf9e464c53f4a0@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2007 00:37:26 -0500 From: "Mike Snitzer" To: "Jeremy Fitzhardinge" Subject: Re: forced umount? Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <45FB6E32.3050009@goop.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <170fa0d20703162106v47dc13e1u1ae5381576f372ed@mail.gmail.com> <45FB6E32.3050009@goop.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 3/16/07, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > Mike Snitzer wrote: > > Is this forced umount work even considered worthwhile by the greater > > Linux community? Is anyone actively working on this? > > Have a look at all the discussion about revoke/frevoke on lkml over the > last week or two. Thanks for the heads up; its good to see that Pekka Enberg's work has continued. I actually stumbled onto that line of work earlier while searching for more info on Tigran Aivazian's forced unmount (badfs) patches: http://lwn.net/Articles/192632/ Mike