From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755461Ab0CHTeP (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Mar 2010 14:34:15 -0500 Received: from mail-ww0-f46.google.com ([74.125.82.46]:63080 "EHLO mail-ww0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754245Ab0CHTeK convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Mar 2010 14:34:10 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=jv5kdBZ/28KI8H7kePDYJydkSdGt0Dn+1oH1rm2f5R6ShAPAginiL6UPuwLLtfmqzy gfxHjSxCIs6N5UVnBTh+J9esKgRLpNUmwI/7U1iKr7unbTTxtj538afXsWlBAgb2Dvp4 S9SO6/evcNzI7/FSwNSKsgsr00lqhNDVx8Mok= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <4B947393.2050002@kernel.org> Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2010 14:34:08 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 98edb0ae30926079 Message-ID: <170fa0d21003081134g491034e5v4aad4d43853e48ec@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: ATA 4 KiB sector issues. From: Mike Snitzer To: "Martin K. Petersen" Cc: Tejun Heo , "linux-ide@vger.kernel.org" , lkml , Daniel Taylor , Jeff Garzik , Mark Lord , tytso@mit.edu, "H. Peter Anvin" , hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp, Andrew Morton , Alan Cox , irtiger@gmail.com, Matthew Wilcox , aschnell@suse.de, knikanth@suse.de, jdelvare@suse.de, Karel Zak , Jim Meyering Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 10:18 AM, Martin K. Petersen wrote: >>>>>> "Tejun" == Tejun Heo writes: > > Tejun> The [Windows Vista/7] partitioner seems to be using 1M as the > Tejun> basic alignment unit and offsetting from there if explicitly > Tejun> requested by the drive > > Yep. > > > Tejun> Please note that hdparm is misreporting the alignment offset.  It > Tejun> should be reporting 512 instead of 256 for offset-by-one drives. > > Already fixed.  Your hdparm must be old. > > > > Tejun> Partitioners maybe should only align partitions which will be > Tejun> used by Linux and default to the traditional layout for others > Tejun> while allowing explicit override. > > I don't think we take the partition type into account.  Karel? > > > Tejun> Reportedly, commonly used partitioners aren't ready to handle > Tejun> drives larger than 2 TiB in any configuration and alignment isn't > Tejun> done properly for drives with 4 KiB physical sectors.  4 KiB > Tejun> logical sector support is broken in both the kernel > > Huh, what?  My homedir is on a 4KiB LBS/PBS drive and has been for ~2 > years. > > > Tejun> (need more details and probably a whole section on partitioner > Tejun> behaviors) > > I'm Cc:'ing Karel Zak and Jim Meyering who have been doing all the > alignment work for fdisk and parted respectively.  Karel, Jim: The full > writeup is here: > >        http://ata.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/ATA_4_KiB_sector_issues > > It'd be great if you guys could share what you have been doing to the > tooling. I've been keeping track of all the pieces in play, have coordinated with kzak and jim, and have a summary that offers some amount of macro detail (at the end I touch on parted and fdisk): http://people.redhat.com/msnitzer/docs/io-limits.txt