From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261837AbVGRQgl (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Jul 2005 12:36:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261840AbVGRQgl (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Jul 2005 12:36:41 -0400 Received: from adsl-69-230-3-206.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net ([69.230.3.206]:1232 "EHLO mailix.sanjose.privnets") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261837AbVGRQgk (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Jul 2005 12:36:40 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17115.55954.942676.450479@mailix.sanjose.privnets> Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 09:36:34 -0700 From: Richard Gooch To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [GIT PATCH] Remove devfs from 2.6.12-git In-Reply-To: <20050623045959.GB10386@kroah.com> References: <20050621062926.GB15062@kroah.com> <20050620235403.45bf9613.akpm@osdl.org> <20050621151019.GA19666@kroah.com> <20050623010031.GB17453@mikebell.org> <20050623045959.GB10386@kroah.com> X-Mailer: VM 7.03 under Emacs 20.7.2 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Greg KH writes: > I do care about this, please don't think that. But here's my reasoning > for why it needs to go: [...] > - original developer of devfs has publicly stated udev is a > replacement. Well, that's news to me! > - policy in the kernel. Like sysfs :-) > - clutter and mess In the eye of the beholder. > - code is broken and unfixable No proof. Never say never... Regards, Richard....