From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
Cc: andrew@lunn.ch, hkallweit1@gmail.com, linux@armlinux.org.uk,
davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, richardcochran@gmail.com,
Divya.Koppera@microchip.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: phy: micrel: lan8814: Fix when enabling/disabling 1-step timestamping
Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2024 02:30:29 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <171219782963.25056.2283938285723904653.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240402071634.2483524-1-horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
Hello:
This patch was applied to netdev/net.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>:
On Tue, 2 Apr 2024 09:16:34 +0200 you wrote:
> There are 2 issues with the blamed commit.
> 1. When the phy is initialized, it would enable the disabled of UDPv4
> checksums. The UDPv6 checksum is already enabled by default. So when
> 1-step is configured then it would clear these flags.
> 2. After the 1-step is configured, then if 2-step is configured then the
> 1-step would be still configured because it is not clearing the flag.
> So the sync frames will still have origin timestamps set.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [net] net: phy: micrel: lan8814: Fix when enabling/disabling 1-step timestamping
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/de99e1ea3a35
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-04 2:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-02 7:16 Horatiu Vultur
2024-04-02 7:55 ` Divya.Koppera
2024-04-04 2:30 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=171219782963.25056.2283938285723904653.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
--to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
--cc=Divya.Koppera@microchip.com \
--cc=UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=horatiu.vultur@microchip.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®