From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE30912F5AF; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 15:33:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713540795; cv=none; b=Wld/e068YB4BOVWkmtwxP0iaAiEEs+nCQN65gBl1Sx2++ZHeM1DZ1jIkK/6k6/JxJN2RxkpLCfVLc3pA7/MglwzOwtDVIAlP1SYcbwE/bhIZdAY/xHFcf1WU0n3cCc9gnWcOUzjuWUxESAln9Z/Xqy4ffSPIBTZyBwjo87UQ0IA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1713540795; c=relaxed/simple; bh=qh3vNFBVAwBLO622Q3sbcNK0OnRPD6sqlJxOuDdcyBk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=lHLEXW6gAysctb5FBXsRm2SylfW103euhhwk9eBP0DAewH8VigAxPinrIsQwN+4o9i+/uBxbIDqDLAJ3icqxQxSHOGtmwKZEYpPMwd4KykxZKkLaG2II9syIX5KMnD0eO+J2Vzlacx64Dhlu+am2wbLxTcs8wL4tL8solZvNO2g= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=oi9AiWme; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="oi9AiWme" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0FBD4C32782; Fri, 19 Apr 2024 15:33:12 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1713540795; bh=qh3vNFBVAwBLO622Q3sbcNK0OnRPD6sqlJxOuDdcyBk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=oi9AiWme+dHsshak9uz3sb7NIUWiOkX6kVzQdudCPe45QeF4RYdGtGace23uUBVO1 +KgKULeNKBPI3X0vOD3cIi1EObCf4Vp9RfDHkMgC0ZXHxKz/PcGcvojcv/y5zMZqD6 0/mXtMBPHXKh3f8qtqeFD4OqXblx4Z7iAamJ7Bp6a8ewKbiFE48Yb+etircx2RlgRI 9L4CJoc7e5WTU7vIQNXxK4m7RjOlmPe4RBZoISSp1IT9CASZyTZ5Ne4fFI3FzHhkJ1 GyFGq6BawYh1vcex9e2tclwJKcQ6BOzBiiFMv0Hx1REe/Cr81/zzU82B7d1LIBVHaM cOcTWvKYjk0Hw== From: Will Deacon To: Catalin Marinas , David Woodhouse Cc: kernel-team@android.com, Will Deacon , Robert Moore , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Len Brown , Sudeep Holla , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, acpica-devel@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Support clean reboot after hibernate on Arm64 Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 16:32:58 +0100 Message-Id: <171345345397.312430.3943582845307730698.b4-ty@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 In-Reply-To: <20240412073530.2222496-1-dwmw2@infradead.org> References: <20240412073530.2222496-1-dwmw2@infradead.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Mon, 11 Mar 2024 12:19:14 +0000, David Woodhouse wrote: > When the hardware signature in the ACPI FACS changes, the OS is supposed > to perform a clean reboot instead of attempting to resume on a changed > platform. > > Although these patches have a functional dependency, they could be merged > separately. The second patch just won't *see* a FACS table if the ACPICA > fix isn't present. > > [...] Applied to arm64 (for-next/acpi), thanks! [1/2] ACPICA: Detect FACS even for hardware reduced platforms https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/bc5b492ac305 [2/2] arm64: acpi: Honour firmware_signature field of FACS, if it exists https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/fbaad243b536 Cheers, -- Will https://fixes.arm64.dev https://next.arm64.dev https://will.arm64.dev