From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750779AbVHQBiE (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Aug 2005 21:38:04 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750786AbVHQBiE (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Aug 2005 21:38:04 -0400 Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.10.76.45]:31127 "EHLO ozlabs.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750779AbVHQBiD (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Aug 2005 21:38:03 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17154.38156.13295.731022@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 11:38:20 +1000 From: Paul Mackerras To: Kumar Gala Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] ppc32: removed usage of In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 21.4.1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Kumar Gala writes: > Made a dummy include like it is in ppc64 and removed any > users if it in arch/ppc. Why can't we just delete asm-ppc/segment.h (and asm-ppc64/segment.h too, for that matter) entirely? Paul.