From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59D16167DA0; Wed, 29 May 2024 19:25:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1717010723; cv=none; b=eJdiOJp+ArG82rF/rI4AMKEs3tRnSLfQQvpevpuPrDlHFz9c0tAVuaJiCqh+uDtjKqDfZVXQv+FXdKcJ3vSxUaDEgyySmmOk6zxJPsq3yaffCu5/a+CWgXIKjEx4mtJddhdGr0hMfnhGHND/ZMHtKpvT3xDcm11ifBVKp2/diZI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1717010723; c=relaxed/simple; bh=8hnX5+K+L9gtEsPSecwouqZPNByI/V3C1YUs3P5OMKk=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=VFYEvakINagDhNJB/Knaoeh79/r1vP7IvIyO1IPAZsitFxeJ42vlyxT4YTINFGkNUIFCt5szDPGBCA8i3WPzRu+RJK4UjIhz5oy5QDWmsp779h/kNMjkATOpTY9NH3AU3HnTMa8CgQtE9/DFVMJHtKN7zAOvEz7MGbn99n245Qs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=eG04acR1; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="eG04acR1" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8DD97C113CC; Wed, 29 May 2024 19:25:22 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1717010723; bh=8hnX5+K+L9gtEsPSecwouqZPNByI/V3C1YUs3P5OMKk=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=eG04acR1Ip+bUHa1/4moCvsgaOxyC2uhwuFA2mGOEyfT0adu7qpV0yTtV0BfDx0qh Z9UsSJkNFV/26hHt7KV98pnhsd6CQevFL4lHKPorqDJLfSl2v86hmboZ775x5FE854 RhkPIqstx6NxJUN0rKorvvR8SCtIlnxgrIFRgzSax4cQRXaRCyL3oNTjVHylXJ3tbU z9rBdliAtVwzwIF8A2vBoWIl6nqEjK6TcXPy6wyopxvZ2fychJ/JzbQ+MEcVMngfUr 8fGK9+d50bjSJ+o8XOSfJsKQx/MjFgYqDDesjatIj0cjM/XwWexOw62f+gzRdEAWil v0HZiIto3j48w== From: Namhyung Kim To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alexander Shishkin , Ian Rogers , Mark Rutland , Peter Zijlstra , Jiri Olsa , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, Adrian Hunter , Ingo Molnar , Kan Liang Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] perf arm-spe: Unaligned pointer work around Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 12:25:20 -0700 Message-ID: <171701062467.353211.6004518321763325404.b4-ty@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.45.1.288.g0e0cd299f1-goog In-Reply-To: <20240514052402.3031871-1-irogers@google.com> References: <20240514052402.3031871-1-irogers@google.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Mon, 13 May 2024 22:24:02 -0700, Ian Rogers wrote: > Use get_unaligned_leXX instead of leXX_to_cpu to handle unaligned > pointers. Such pointers occur with libFuzzer testing. > > A similar change for intel-pt was done in: > https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231005190451.175568-6-adrian.hunter@intel.com > > > [...] Applied to perf-tools-next, thanks! Best regards, -- Namhyung Kim