From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A5E4144D23 for ; Tue, 4 Jun 2024 13:17:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1717507042; cv=none; b=rCplv2jrKMCgnZ9RMR8UKokBHK5FdKMwpuOEX3dRUSNBEAuK9oIocqTZe6iT5muVxd+Nhn6zaboCEP6257IpnYD4XwPgvdsQ640lGjvVEiDihYwpOAbcSPJzxQKaXw9gwtDOALmPWf0P7XW9OzSVF+8F/Cj+NKuOUPzfHk3RbuA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1717507042; c=relaxed/simple; bh=9jHucXNWh3fPhzv3jEjUYgJvngK+uwydH0NF8rFlbCI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=QzZRgptebDxWQGVGdjPTQ5VP1FS6xbSsuvqkD9Ev0shfTZwHg4UpBwtwVzJX38xv+yOmh30Ppa3J+X/7bHdsuUr56t4j+QFb1DVDDyCumUALzcBTqEz0htYoVFDqvXG3Optk+91KJJ5mVGpP3csAxLWbrI3b57hlJJ6SUy8WAwI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=C+B4Tyjw; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="C+B4Tyjw" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1769AC4AF07; Tue, 4 Jun 2024 13:17:19 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1717507041; bh=9jHucXNWh3fPhzv3jEjUYgJvngK+uwydH0NF8rFlbCI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=C+B4Tyjwrp7wU1SVntgOMtFwnTyBng4pAinkeJm1/O/Y+grnZVDQrv6uCdoNoHLyk vgEuiMkprH4spWvdliLzg9svCMTzER/RPlQpH3TMYLzVjPxg21VdrttWLYdh5gKzoU h9jvyjpUl8Z7ButGFfYbsIj8Kx/BCSAFcKTPQiIlKu61rsIlONpbEPQAjFhbuDyo8K 80owf5u4mqEikA1o7aghRGSo5zy6bAwymI9Asv2fL3oEw8dIlA3QxDoVIqgWIRz5Gw NNaxmVrIsvFhLc1stdUZq0jA5NHRDNXdHmWr/WsNlDqBTuNBBDY/Cc/3kxbGmY/X8m Zli7QDAvc5A/Q== From: Mike Rapoport To: Borislav Petkov Cc: Mike Rapoport , LKML , "Borislav Petkov (AMD)" , Narasimhan V Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/mm/numa: Use NUMA_NO_NODE when calling memblock_set_node() Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2024 16:16:57 +0300 Message-ID: <171750701353.925406.16431237983148253122.b4-ty@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.43.0 In-Reply-To: <20240603141005.23261-1-bp@kernel.org> References: <20240603141005.23261-1-bp@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit From: Mike Rapoport (IBM) On Mon, 03 Jun 2024 16:10:05 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: > memblock_set_node() warns about using MAX_NUMNODES, see > > e0eec24e2e19 ("memblock: make memblock_set_node() also warn about use of MAX_NUMNODES") > > for details. > > > [...] Applied to fixes branch of memblock.git tree, thanks! [1/1] x86/mm/numa: Use NUMA_NO_NODE when calling memblock_set_node() commit: c55f3cc2d9f241d6e45336fd48dafa755c012297 tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rppt/memblock branch: fixes -- Sincerely yours, Mike.