From: "Rob Herring (Arm)" <robh@kernel.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Cc: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] dt-bindings: incomplete-devices: document devices without bindings
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2024 12:39:22 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <172080781462.1404657.13880263626115458163.robh@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240712121146.90942-1-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
On Fri, 12 Jul 2024 14:11:46 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> There are devices in the wild with non-updatable firmware coming with
> ACPI tables with rejected compatibles, e.g. "ltr,ltrf216a". Linux
> kernel still supports this device via ACPI PRP0001, however the
> compatible was never accepted to bindings.
>
> There are also several early PowerPC or SPARC platforms using
> compatibles for their OpenFirmware, but without in-tree DTS. Often the
> legacy compatible is not correct in terms of current Devicetree
> specification, e.g. missing vendor prefix.
>
> Finally there are also Linux-specific tools and test code with
> compatibles.
>
> Add a schema covering above cases purely to satisfy the DT schema and
> scripts/checkpatch.pl checks for undocumented compatibles. For
> ltr,ltrf216a this also documents the consensus: compatible is allowed
> only via ACPI PRP0001, but not bindings.
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240705095047.90558-1-marex@denx.de/
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220731173446.7400bfa8@jic23-huawei/T/#me55be502302d70424a85368c2645c89f860b7b40
> Cc: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
> Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
> Cc: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@collabora.com>
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
>
> ---
>
> Changes in v3:
> 1. Incorrect->Legacy
> 2. Drop ohci-littledian
> 3. Drop unittest
>
> Changes in v2:
> 1. Rename to incomplete-devices.yaml
> 2. Add many compatibles based on Rob's feedback, rewrite descriptions in
> the schema.
> ---
> .../bindings/incomplete-devices.yaml | 137 ++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 137 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/incomplete-devices.yaml
>
Applied, thanks!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-12 18:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-12 12:11 Krzysztof Kozlowski
2024-07-12 18:39 ` Rob Herring (Arm) [this message]
2024-08-03 9:33 ` Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=172080781462.1404657.13880263626115458163.robh@kernel.org \
--to=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marex@denx.de \
--cc=sebastian.reichel@collabora.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®