From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lelv0142.ext.ti.com (lelv0142.ext.ti.com [198.47.23.249]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC14720DF4; Sun, 1 Sep 2024 20:23:43 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.47.23.249 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1725222225; cv=none; b=psfxqWhCn5y3PVhDQaoLuHNn1vjRtPZ6JAXmWI+PpiqrXMnYum8X6RjY/3qWt6gAmDd7n+/opHQfnSdGyIVZIWyHDI2nqt8mYohsdf1kEDRjR1rlbOnh4pbpEzF91SZXF96Vxbk46CxCVtbNoz4Va4W4lwcy5Glt70kV5v/U7q8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1725222225; c=relaxed/simple; bh=mhS9wq/z1LmRJm25oMawrdaABZQXIXK+jjXel794nKk=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=U56EZscOuAGgkmBVccLxYfcFFIingV3ScuxWyfKvb0o78HKAbzvSBqmlgGqzNqSt8BhLHMohljfUOeG4oSRkEmQTPrKIM5O1WdIOEtSc0SWXTWlxK4UWaSQzH7FqlX2W95f/T0YeGO6FLMhZJy26jNO16REb2qbDuigbS/Vz2DI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ti.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b=cg6s0aFA; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.47.23.249 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=ti.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="cg6s0aFA" Received: from lelv0265.itg.ti.com ([10.180.67.224]) by lelv0142.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 481KNQbv022550; Sun, 1 Sep 2024 15:23:26 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1725222206; bh=P63PBx57TLR3J3nlihP0rfAAdQSDZKmFeLSsxI2ky2k=; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=cg6s0aFACZC49WR87Z0XVIBYcfL1xk5vCepikG98ZPIjjn8AE7BJPDiPHAvmxHv3D 9nvxe1DGMKQnzKazMEziZfhKyw5v/6KySpS4EtrBXNncxIQ1VPbbaMWO62chr9jwUu Hog86MeeUiDPHWu5YLgO/T79l9w5hiHIReVt+0QQ= Received: from DFLE104.ent.ti.com (dfle104.ent.ti.com [10.64.6.25]) by lelv0265.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 481KNQQC016796 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Sun, 1 Sep 2024 15:23:26 -0500 Received: from DFLE101.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.22) by DFLE104.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2507.23; Sun, 1 Sep 2024 15:23:26 -0500 Received: from lelvsmtp5.itg.ti.com (10.180.75.250) by DFLE101.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.22) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2507.23 via Frontend Transport; Sun, 1 Sep 2024 15:23:26 -0500 Received: from localhost (uda0133052.dhcp.ti.com [128.247.81.232]) by lelvsmtp5.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 481KNQkg126828; Sun, 1 Sep 2024 15:23:26 -0500 From: Nishanth Menon To: Conor Dooley , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Rob Herring , Nishanth Menon CC: Tero Kristo , Vignesh Raghavendra , , , , Dhruva Gole , Roger Quadros Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am642-evm-nand: Rename pinctrl node and gpio-hog names Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2024 15:23:23 -0500 Message-ID: <172522211850.998098.12472787357819086145.b4-ty@ti.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.46.0 In-Reply-To: <20240830113137.3986091-1-nm@ti.com> References: <20240830113137.3986091-1-nm@ti.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Hi Nishanth Menon, On Fri, 30 Aug 2024 06:31:37 -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote: > Rename the pin mux and gpio-hog node names to match up with binding > rules. This fixes dtbs_check warnings: > 'gpmc0-pins-default' does not match any of the regexes: '-pins(-[0-9]+)?$|-pin$', 'pinctrl-[0-9]+' > 'gpio0-36' does not match '^(hog-[0-9]+|.+-hog(-[0-9]+)?)$' > > While at it, change the phandle name to be consistent with the pinctrl > naming. > > [...] I have applied the following to branch ti-k3-dts-next on [1]. Thank you! [1/1] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am642-evm-nand: Rename pinctrl node and gpio-hog names commit: 47ca0776e3637e8cfbf84483a0b0c22fbdf3a9f7 All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent up the chain during the next merge window (or sooner if it is a relevant bug fix), however if problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted. You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed. If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing patches will not be replaced. Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying to this mail. [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ti/linux.git -- Regards, Nishanth Menon Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3 1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D