From: "tip-bot2 for NeilBrown" <tip-bot2@linutronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [tip: sched/core] softirq: use bit waits instead of var waits.
Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2024 07:56:21 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <172837418103.1442.7837579642724319886.tip-bot2@tip-bot2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240925053405.3960701-8-neilb@suse.de>
The following commit has been merged into the sched/core branch of tip:
Commit-ID: 49994911b401c5f6b979060ffbc834949a024d8a
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/49994911b401c5f6b979060ffbc834949a024d8a
Author: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
AuthorDate: Wed, 25 Sep 2024 15:31:44 +10:00
Committer: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
CommitterDate: Mon, 07 Oct 2024 09:28:39 +02:00
softirq: use bit waits instead of var waits.
The waiting in softirq.c is always waiting for a bit to be cleared.
This makes the bit wait functions seem more suitable.
By switching over we can rid of all explicit barriers. We also use
wait_on_bit_lock() to avoid an explicit loop.
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240925053405.3960701-8-neilb@suse.de
---
kernel/softirq.c | 14 ++++----------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/softirq.c b/kernel/softirq.c
index d082e78..b756d6b 100644
--- a/kernel/softirq.c
+++ b/kernel/softirq.c
@@ -748,10 +748,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__tasklet_hi_schedule);
static bool tasklet_clear_sched(struct tasklet_struct *t)
{
- if (test_and_clear_bit(TASKLET_STATE_SCHED, &t->state)) {
- wake_up_var(&t->state);
+ if (test_and_clear_wake_up_bit(TASKLET_STATE_SCHED, &t->state))
return true;
- }
WARN_ONCE(1, "tasklet SCHED state not set: %s %pS\n",
t->use_callback ? "callback" : "func",
@@ -871,8 +869,7 @@ void tasklet_kill(struct tasklet_struct *t)
if (in_interrupt())
pr_notice("Attempt to kill tasklet from interrupt\n");
- while (test_and_set_bit(TASKLET_STATE_SCHED, &t->state))
- wait_var_event(&t->state, !test_bit(TASKLET_STATE_SCHED, &t->state));
+ wait_on_bit_lock(&t->state, TASKLET_STATE_SCHED, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
tasklet_unlock_wait(t);
tasklet_clear_sched(t);
@@ -882,16 +879,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(tasklet_kill);
#if defined(CONFIG_SMP) || defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT)
void tasklet_unlock(struct tasklet_struct *t)
{
- smp_mb__before_atomic();
- clear_bit(TASKLET_STATE_RUN, &t->state);
- smp_mb__after_atomic();
- wake_up_var(&t->state);
+ clear_and_wake_up_bit(TASKLET_STATE_RUN, &t->state);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tasklet_unlock);
void tasklet_unlock_wait(struct tasklet_struct *t)
{
- wait_var_event(&t->state, !test_bit(TASKLET_STATE_RUN, &t->state));
+ wait_on_bit(&t->state, TASKLET_STATE_RUN, TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(tasklet_unlock_wait);
#endif
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-08 7:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-25 5:31 [PATCH 0/7 v3] Make wake_up_{bit,var} less fragile NeilBrown
2024-09-25 5:31 ` [PATCH 1/7] sched: change wake_up_bit() and related function to expect unsigned long * NeilBrown
2024-10-08 7:56 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for NeilBrown
2024-09-25 5:31 ` [PATCH 2/7] sched: Improve documentation for wake_up_bit/wait_on_bit family of functions NeilBrown
2024-10-08 7:56 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for NeilBrown
2024-09-25 5:31 ` [PATCH 3/7] sched: Document wait_var_event() family of functions and wake_up_var() NeilBrown
2024-10-08 7:56 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for NeilBrown
2024-09-25 5:31 ` [PATCH 4/7] sched: Add test_and_clear_wake_up_bit() and atomic_dec_and_wake_up() NeilBrown
2024-10-08 7:56 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for NeilBrown
2024-09-25 5:31 ` [PATCH 5/7] sched: Add wait/wake interface for variable updated under a lock NeilBrown
2024-10-08 7:56 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for NeilBrown
2024-09-25 5:31 ` [PATCH 6/7] sched: add wait_var_event_io() NeilBrown
2024-10-08 7:56 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for NeilBrown
2024-09-25 5:31 ` [PATCH 7/7] softirq: use bit waits instead of var waits NeilBrown
2024-10-08 7:56 ` tip-bot2 for NeilBrown [this message]
2024-09-26 17:13 ` [PATCH 0/7 v3] Make wake_up_{bit,var} less fragile Thomas Gleixner
2024-09-26 21:14 ` NeilBrown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=172837418103.1442.7837579642724319886.tip-bot2@tip-bot2 \
--to=tip-bot2@linutronix.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®