From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 16313137776; Wed, 23 Oct 2024 18:00:20 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729706421; cv=none; b=bbHNjI6pirUcvRtPwO8mBUFkTkWsgJSWgPdXwb3uvIIaCX3qTntLr369Bwt5VYsFHnluuvc4f0mH+HErXBuCnO/WTR1xRnC79ljUzOv+BtKSK1dkbxMMcvdnwVmlNBLtiYKILqKv50hBc+xAEHJZeP0To6ZtMmpc9vFXwPorOeU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729706421; c=relaxed/simple; bh=NHCfiBqL3e7BAY9HX4hxpEblYY8yvQhUCNOqPDOFPto=; h=From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:Message-Id:Date: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=kymDCB2Ez5UFZJK2hWTutnqUDc3u9zWOFMyafsNIaoH+7OWj95qDSR/X3vIkyrHz8s4EunkcpDRzaIYyQNxEwfUU0ndJG1erwyK49C67IBHNCf4kIxyPSanaWjMsmZubTdDEKd0Qi8/6GmWCHw2DJoD87w2x77PNt555FCFbyM4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=ZstdBQNK; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="ZstdBQNK" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4FC15C4CECD; Wed, 23 Oct 2024 18:00:20 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1729706420; bh=NHCfiBqL3e7BAY9HX4hxpEblYY8yvQhUCNOqPDOFPto=; h=From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:Date:From; b=ZstdBQNKznlJytZGiQI8dNQvZL/3TafU6iiK3QExTNNppOlozz4k6mceFMLKGbnsC 7rxTBQS4z5E/pzrCqGHoT/+gsak2cE92cNzbA9KW7r+y01hrOBJ6O1chHWi8F5NLoA +oCFmN5jYOkK9FV6sJqBr91Cf2FY1JY/Ba6nXcxH9hi7IatZnSM7abdtgDysjc7ohy siIYIcn6fZBjdDES8hQfus37Xhwg7ktHHal3WJO/vvh/XTk87aLAgH7/eJVegLZpWK QPJ/hqMoLt6uryqiCwiRf2x++AWVyERdbybdXKrfoOCdgm6G9LA6KKwKh2VtFo0AuF QuzFWVkAcNzKQ== From: Namhyung Kim To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , Jiri Olsa , Ian Rogers , Adrian Hunter , Kan Liang , Clark Williams , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , James Clark In-Reply-To: <20241020021842.1752770-1-acme@kernel.org> References: <20241020021842.1752770-1-acme@kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3 v3] Expose the 'perf test -w' workloads functionality Message-Id: <172970642028.1242473.4878778833467222484.b4-ty@kernel.org> Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2024 11:00:20 -0700 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: b4 0.15-dev-c04d2 On Sat, 19 Oct 2024 23:18:39 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo > > Hi, > > I noticed that the 'perf test -w' code wasn't well exposed, so > add a '--list-workloads' option to list the existing workloads and document it > in the 'perf test' man page. > > [...] Applied to perf-tools-next, thanks! Best regards, Namhyung