From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-139-mta248.mxyeet.net (mail-139-mta248.mxyeet.net [23.172.139.248]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5629A483BEB for ; Mon, 5 Oct 2026 14:08:18 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=23.172.139.248 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791209300; cv=none; b=Vhmq6vhs2LzOXNlYLuNjz28sJLf3PfCVmO5EAnEnz/Rvh/LIdUWC4Opjz9DLGWLsrjfKSA/Dpk8wB4UADgCrTn052pGq6O/dzKPldpTP/SM7CJSGYxxZcSOqAe+801ed/TIWQY0521Uesc/Hi+ikJNcpUzAUQc7O+TtqJLB9dhE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791209300; c=relaxed/simple; bh=bXP2gsPKInS3wxEiRyHL64d/IyuhIOqfNGcm9LumHTk=; h=MIME-Version:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References: Message-ID:Content-Type; b=QHr0efOlHJEjdiLAEBYIVF8oxtZ2KTEJEC60ipq4r3ibyuEbD5HSF9GhG3NcCgPNrVJFSgNRiHhG+IWV12MX5rP2KSNKI3frwk7dNjDNY8QM4helVbaWLUx8hUAbwdgQnCe9vM+EUE3SVcZSfJh+TP+pfLMr6moGdl68hfq/Q+Y= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=endrik.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=endrik.dev; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=endrik.dev header.i=@endrik.dev header.b=ps608y4H; arc=none smtp.client-ip=23.172.139.248 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=endrik.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=endrik.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=endrik.dev header.i=@endrik.dev header.b="ps608y4H" Received: from lu-shared04.cpanelplatform.com [2602:faa9:3000::1006] (Authenticated sender: relay@mxyeet.net) by mail-139-mta248.mxyeet.net (MailFilter Outbound) with ESMTPSA id 1a10c64c76900089d7.004 for (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384); Mon, 05 Oct 2026 14:08:13 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=endrik.dev; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Message-ID:References: In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:MIME-Version:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Unsubscribe-Post: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=tx3Yyu7EF76UxqlyUCyryECBr1KTcBsd0J+ccOAf8Yk=; b=ps608y4HhMrmhuFVL3TB8eycQF Ed40sDquQKudRnUFH/vYsFROYzGzQUgyCnfZkU5AZDbp5Hlf7Lo1O76Y5VNbd9GNCtkPMtMiTxGY1 zxMfggJXFju/HAdmNidqkC3COC/sm844mNr9ZHRRo+dObGNWOgybc+w8siVM+suBWZnIa4dM5Im0Y SiMA6RCP+szT06qwvG8Oleqj6PnVRkQAK4iilaCzeAlPX3gXWLYUB7t/HD1cbkgjNiy0toVatiDRl 7ZzqO49Vl2276zXm4qzY+bZDQ/V3T64KZ2XlOyTGBR9ULfrxelGLyf3Ji8Yv0iaVZ5ux2Ko14yaVz 6istlqIw==; Received: from [::1] (port=41434 helo=lu-shared04.cpanelplatform.com) by lu-shared04.cpanelplatform.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.100.1) (envelope-from ) id 1xDjMR-00000002mNC-3l8V; Mon, 05 Oct 2026 16:08:11 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2026 16:08:11 +0200 From: git@endrik.dev To: "Korenblit, Miriam Rachel" Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, git@endrik.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH] wifi: iwlwifi: mld: include VI packets in low latency detection In-Reply-To: References: <20261004214438.128694-1-git@endrik.dev> User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.6.19 Message-ID: <173121002b0895ac0b12bd3cbae3b78b@endrik.dev> X-Sender: git@endrik.dev Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-From-Rewrite: unmodified, there is a forwarder that points to the actual sender. X-AuthUser: endrik@endrik.dev X-NCN-Id: qrBpiUCfTMOkjygEbw== > I don't want to rely on the value of the different enums too much. > Let's be explicit: > return tid_to_mac80211_ac[tid] == IEEE80211_AC_VI || > tid_to_mac80211_ac[tid] == IEEE80211_AC_VO Hey, I actually considered that initially, but as a kernel newbie, I thought a minimal patch would result in less hassle for reviewers. A v2 with the explicit comparison is coming shortly. Thanks, Endrik